Turkoglu or Rashard?

SabasRevenge! · Post #1 » by **SabasRevenge!** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:05 am

Which one?

Which position?

How much is he worth?

yunggunz · Post #2 » by **yunggunz** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:16 am

This year Turk. Career, Shard.

both are 3's.

both are worth between 7-9 mill based on this years play.

Griever24 · Post #3 » by **Griever24** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:42 am

Rashard .. Hes Simply been better throughout his career

Kabookalu · Post #4 » by **Kabookalu** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:09 am

Hedo this season. Didn't know he was this good.

PimpORL · Post #5 » by **PimpORL** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:58 am

Hedo may be better stat-wise, but Rashard is definitely the better player. He scores in the context of the game and he's a lot more efficient when given the ball more.

prekazi · Post #6 » by **prekazi** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:03 am

Hedo is the better passer, better rebounder, better ball handler and better defender. Oh and he is cheaper.

hermes · Post #7 » by **hermes** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:25 pm

hedo now
rashard for the entire career

TooNice00 · Post #8 » by **TooNice00** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:35 pm

yeah rashard is the better player, he is just playing out of position.

NetsForce · Post #9 » by **NetsForce** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:47 pm

Rashard. Hedo forces wayyyy too many shots Lewis is better at playing within himself and deferring to other teammates.

Joseph17 · Post #10 » by **Joseph17** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:59 am

Hedo Turkoglu. He's basically better than Shard at everything except spot up shooting.

The_Believer · Post #11 » by **The_Believer** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:02 pm

If you take contracts in, Hedo is much better.

Smills91 · Post #12 » by **Smills91** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:21 pm

Rashard overall is bettter, however, I'd rather have Hedo when you consider the contracts attached to each.

subcomandante · Post #13 » by **subcomandante** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:45 am

hedo is cheaper..

that's why;

hedo > rashard

prekazi · Post #14 » by **prekazi** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:59 am

subcomandante wrote:hedo is cheaper..

that's why;

hedo > rashard

...aaand he's playing better.

Hedo: 19.1 pts 6 reb 4.3 ast 1.1 stl

Lewis: 18.4 pts 5.1 reb 2.4 ast 1.1 stl

subcomandante · Post #15 » by **subcomandante** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:01 am

prekazi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

...aaand he's playing better.

Hedo: 19.1 pts 6 reb 4.3 ast 1.1 stl

Lewis: 18.4 pts 5.1 reb 2.4 ast 1.1 stl

of course. much better in this season. hope he'll be better.

hedo for mip

Ern III · Post #16 » by **Ern III** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:10 pm

Disregarding value for money, Hedo gets my vote.

Neither play defense of an exceptional standard, but Turkoglu is a much more versatile player on the offensive end.

And if it is the case that one player had hammered in the basic fundamentals throughout his basketball upbringing - playing positions 1 thru 4 - and the other was lauded as he simply outgrew, outshot and outjumped his adolescent opponents before directly joining the professional ranks, I'd be able to deduce whom is who.

kooldude · Post #17 » by **kooldude** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:35 pm

Hedo made another clutch game-winner today. just sayin'

brown_kids · Post #18 » by **brown_kids** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:39 pm

kooldude wrote:Hedo made another clutch game-winner today. just sayin'

Wow, that was such a crazy shot

Cammo101 · Post #19 » by **Cammo101** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:41 pm

Hedo is better in large part because he plays next to Shard. I heart both.

Kosta · Post #20 » by **Kosta** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:46 pm

Man it's sad that the Magic are paying Rashard Lewis 100+ million dollars over the next 5 seasons, only if Turkoglu could have brought this kind of game to the forefront before. Shard has opened things up for a him a bit more, but any other three point threat would have done the same thing.