RealGM

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:48 pm**

who u got?

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:49 pm**

Paul easily.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:50 pm**

i'd take davis if it wasn't for his habit of chucking. of course, his health is also a concern. paul easily.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:54 pm**

Chris Paul without a doubt.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:55 pm**

Paul, w/out hesitation

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:05 am**

NetsForce wrote:Paul easily.

no not easily, Davis is the most skilled PG ever.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:23 am**

a-rod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

no not easily, Davis is the most skilled PG ever.

False.

I'll take Paul, and although its close, I didn't hesitate with my decision.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:35 am**

a-rod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

no not easily, Davis is the most skilled PG ever.

Most athletically gifted ever? possibly. Most skilled ever? no.

He's not even more skilled than Paul.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:35 am**

a-rod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

no not easily, Davis is the most skilled PG ever.

?

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:11 am**

Paul without question..what does Baron have over him? Paul's PER **** on Baron..his shooting %'s **** on Baron..he's a better defender..his team has been better..what else can Paul do?..

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:13 am**

NO-KG-AI wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Most athletically gifted ever? possibly. Most skilled ever? no.

He's not even more skilled than Paul.

yes he is. baron just doesn't use it as wisely.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:33 am**

22 ppg. 5rpg. 8 apg . 2.5 stl HOW many PG in history had this stat line.
baron can score, pass, rebound, hes a showmen, he can dunk, great defender, yeah his FG% is a bit erotic, but he makes things happen at clutch time when it matter the most.

i can understand why you guys pick paul, but don't tell me its not even close because thats just disrespectful to Davis.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:52 am**

a-rod wrote:22 ppg. 5rpg. 8 apg . 2.5 stl HOW many PG in history had this stat line.
baron can score, pass, rebound, hes a showmen, he can dunk, great defender, yeah his FG% is a bit erotic, but he makes things happen at clutch time when it matter the most.

i can understand why you guys pick paul, but don't tell me its not even close because thats just disrespectful to Davis.

Well, Paul's line is 21.4pts, 3.8rebs, 10.4ast, 2.78stl. Baron's in his prime and his stat line isnt even as good as Paul's who's only in his 3rd year.

To be honest your posts strike me as someone trying to be sarcastic.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:00 am**

AnSweR07 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

yes he is. baron just doesn't use it as wisely.

He's not a better ball handler, he's not a better passer, he's not a better shooter, he doesn't have chris fundamentals as a rebounder or a defender....

He's only really close as a ball handler, everything else he makes up for with his insane athletic ability.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:05 am**

a-rod wrote:22 ppg. 5rpg. 8 apg . 2.5 stl HOW many PG in history had this stat line.
baron can score, pass, rebound, hes a showmen, he can dunk, great defender, yeah his FG% is a bit erotic, but he makes things happen at clutch time when it matter the most.

i can understand why you guys pick paul, but don't tell me its not even close because thats just disrespectful to Davis.

Do you know what Chris' statline would look like if he played at the frantic golden state pace? GS is 3rd in pace, and New Orleans is 26th. He's not even a whole rebound ahead despite the pace difference AND he plays on a team that doesn't rebound that well, and Paul plays on one of the best rebounding teams, with Tyson and West pulling down 21.7 per game alone.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:11 am**

NO-KG-AI wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Do you know what Chris' statline would look like if he played at the frantic golden state pace? GS is 3rd in pace, and New Orleans is 26th. He's not even a whole rebound ahead despite the pace difference AND he plays on a team that doesn't rebound that well, and Paul plays on one of the best rebounding teams, with Tyson and West pulling down 21.7 per game alone.

very good point.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:54 pm**

Chris Paul

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:22 pm**

a-rod wrote:22 ppg. 5rpg. 8 apg . 2.5 stl HOW many PG in history had this stat line.
baron can score, pass, rebound, hes a showmen, he can dunk, great defender, yeah his FG% is a bit erotic, but he makes things happen at clutch time when it matter the most.

i can understand why you guys pick paul, but don't tell me its not even close because thats just disrespectful to Davis.

Classic.

I think the word you were looking for is "erratic".

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:26 pm**

Honestly... who voted for BD?

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:34 pm**

As I've said, the best thing Baron ever did for the Hornets franchise was force his way out, with the end result being Chris Paul.

RealGM

Chris Paul or Baron Davis??

Chris Paul or Baron Davis??