Page 1 of 1
Tim Duncan and Jason Kidd vs. Kevin Garnett and Chris Paul
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:38 am
by Joseph17
Who would win in a 2 on 2? Which duo would be better in a 5 on 5 game?
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:49 am
by miller31time
Garnett and Paul, easily. Kidd is the weak link because he is non-existant on offense.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:52 am
by HarlemHeat37
^^yup..Kidd's a great player, one of the best PG's in the NBA..but he isn't really a big time player if you're just playing 1 on 1, or 2 on 2, because of his shooting..
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:42 am
by Patterns
Kidd can't do anything with only 1 player because it is predictable who he is going to pass it too.
Plus, KG is a better 1v1 player than Duncan anyways.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
by theGreatRC
Paul and KG, no question. Both can create for themselves and Kidd is an inconsistent scorer, even though he is a HOF PG.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:43 pm
by hermes
kg and paul
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:14 pm
by Magz50
Replace Kidd with Nash and it's alot more fair.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:12 pm
by exkonvict
Duncan would score 100 shooting bank shots. KG can't guard that.
Duncan & J-Kidd are both 1st-team defense players.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:42 pm
by Ballings7
miller31time wrote:because he is non-existant on offense.
No he's not. Not in general, anyway..