RealGM

Jordan Farmar


2007-08 Statistics
PPG 9.8
RPG 2.4
APG 2.9
SPG 1.1
BPG 0.1
FG% 0.488
FT% 0.625
3P% 0.406
MPG 21.1
EFF
+ 10.40

Rajon Rondo



2007-08 Statistics
PPG 9.6
RPG 4.0
APG 4.6
SPG 1.8
BPG 0.2
FG% 0.492
FT% 0.596
3P% 0.286
MPG 31.1
EFF
+ 13.41


Who's better?

Wow, for PGs these guys have atrocious FT %'s.


Ill take Rondo, but its pretty damn close if you ask me.

Farmer is better offensively, Rondo is better defensively. If I were starting a team, I'd probably choose Farmer as my starting point guard because he plays with an edge that I like to see in any PG.

Rondo, better playmaker and defender, more efficient, and has a much better ast/to ratio.

I'd pick Rondo because his more of a point guard than Farmar

Rondo because he's a quick and nimble pointguard who can blow right by you if you arent careful.

Rondo. As long as he promises to add some more muscle / bulk up so he doesn't get hurt every other play.

Farmar's numbers extrapolated to Rondo's mpg:

14.4 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 4.26 apg, 1.6 spg

Farmar's also fairly clutch, IMO.

Tough. I value defense a whole lot though, and Rondo's much better on that end of the floor, so i'd say Rondo.

I'd take Rondo, he's a great defender and the better play maker.

I think Rondo is the slightly better overall player right now... But I think Farmar will peak higher

They both aren't very good.

I'll take Farmar because he's a floor general and he can hit the jumper. He's far better offensively IMO. Rondo has it easy on offense and defense because of the big 3.

farmar

U-Borat wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Efficient in what way? If you mean scoring, you're blatantly wrong.

He shoots a higher percentage and turns it over at a lower rate. He also has a higher PER.

the correct answer is Crittenton


if you have to choose from these two scrubs i would choose Farmar.

farmar, rondos d is overrated. farmar has been finishing out games for the lakers and is a better playmaker imo

Rondo. I need someone who can play defense and pass the ball and take it to the rack to create if need be.

Rondo ass/turn: 2.43
Farmar ass/turn: 1.93

And fg% counts how many shots you miss. It doesn't matter if you're shooting a 3 or not you still missed the shot and the other team has the ball.

If were talking shooting skills then TS% is good.

But that's what I look for in a PG, defense and ass/turn ratio.

As for game winners, Rondo just riped an offensive rebound from Dirk last night and layed up the game winning point. Ask Toronto fans about an overtime 3 pointer. Rondo's clutch as well.

edit: I just read my post and realized it came off a little strong. I think Rondo=Farmar just diffrent styles of PGs and I like Rondo's better.

FYI, in case it's being overlooked, Rondo is playing 10 more minutes than Farmar.

OT - I forgot I posted this. Is there a way to keep track of my posts?

Rondo is better than Farmar in every facet of the game except long range shooting

Datruth345 wrote:Rondo is better than Farmar in every facet of the game except long range shooting

Then you haven't seen any Lakers games. Every broadcaster has said that Farmar is a legit starter already while people in Boston are still trying to make him a backup PG with someone else starting.