Page 1 of 1
Who's contract is worse?
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:02 pm
by Bulls_Dynasty6
Ben Wallace: 3 yr/45 mil remaining
Shaq: 3yr/60 mil remaining
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:05 pm
by jeff1624
Ben wallace...
At least shaq puts up 15,7 and sells tickets. What does ben wallace even contribute besides rebounds??
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:07 pm
by Flash3
Wallace, plain & simple.
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:07 pm
by risktaker91
Ben Wallace.
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:14 pm
by AdamTheGreek
No brainer, it's Big Ben.
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:21 pm
by Bucky O'Hare
I'd pay an extra $5M per for Shaq.
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:24 pm
by kandiking
ben is pure deadweight loss. at least shaq is just overpaid
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:24 pm
by Sashobe
Of course the answer to this question is Ben Wallace. Shaq still a key part to any team, but Ben Wallace is not. I am not saying Wallace is horrible, but he is just not good enough for his contract.
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:43 pm
by Nolan
Shaq can still be an impact player, Big Ben's contract is far worse.
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:52 pm
by hermes
wallace
Posted: Wed Feb 6, 2008 11:42 pm
by exkonvict
Ben Wallace's contract is just disgusting.
Shaq still has shown sparks that he can yield a Championship on the right team.
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2008 12:22 am
by gswhoops
Wallace, easily.
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2008 12:25 am
by NetsForce
Shaq. At least Ben Wallace actually plays.
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2008 3:07 am
by MaNs1
Ben Wallace is not even starting quality anymore..