RealGM

Baron Davis or Stephen Jackson.

I find Stephen Jackson's value to be overrated..he's definitely a big piece of the team and the 2nd best player, so I don't mean it in that way..but 0-6 is overrated..he's the 2nd best player, so of course the team is going to struggle without him..but if Baron Davis went down, they probably would have a worse record, because he is their best player..you can say that Baron "is a chucker" so the team would be better off in usual circumstances for some games, but not with the Warriors, since that's how they play..Jackson is a "chucker" too..

so I don't really see how Jackson could be more valuable than Baron..

yeah, jax without baron wouldnt work half as good as the beard-man without captain jack

Monta

The guy makes love to pressure....

Baron when healthy, easily.

baron

Baron...but goddamn Jackson made himself a case last night, didn't he?

Multiple years of +- make the case that Baron is first and Stephen second. Although right now, given Baron's recent struggles and improvements from others, the entire top five (Baron, Stephen, Andris, Monta, and Al) are all about equally important.

They're equally important simply because of how much both feed off each other. BD is the better player individually and Jack is obviously second in that regard. But in terms of leadership and command it's a toss up.

And Al isn't nearly as important as the top 4, floppy.

Diddy.

B Diddy

TD is the MAN wrote:The guy makes love to pressure....

You love that phrase

bd. but monta as of late.