Best player post-Jordan
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Best player post-Jordan
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,816
- And1: 44,828
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
Best player post-Jordan
Having a little debate on the Lakers board. My vote goes to either Shaq or Duncan, leaning towards Shaq. Seems pretty clear to me that it has to be either or, but as you can imagine, that's not the popular choice in our little corner. Tried to search if there's been a similar poll, but I couldn't find anything, so...
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 10,533
- And1: 10
- Joined: Aug 28, 2004
- Location: In between a pimp and a hard place
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,617
- And1: 198
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !
A.J. wrote:Shaq without question, but this is a tough question as is
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:
"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
- Heat3
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,396
- And1: 16,169
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: Where all the children are above average.
- Contact:
-
Best individual player is Kobe. His peak is higher than the other's respective peaks. However Shaq and Duncan have had a much bigger impact on the game than Kobe. Kobe will have to rattle off a few rings on his own to get out of Shaq's shadow. As far as "importance" of players I think it is clearly Shaq.
There was the Jordan era.
There was the Shaq era.
Now it is the Lebron era.
Kobe had the misfortune of coming in and overlapping the primes of other great players. So there is no Kobe era. Same with Duncan although he just keeps winning rings so it doesn't matter
There was the Jordan era.
There was the Shaq era.
Now it is the Lebron era.
Kobe had the misfortune of coming in and overlapping the primes of other great players. So there is no Kobe era. Same with Duncan although he just keeps winning rings so it doesn't matter

Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.
James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,466
- And1: 5,345
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
1a. Shaq
1b. Duncan
3. Kobe
Shaq and Duncan both have 3 finals mvp's and Shaq has 1 league MVP with 3 seasons of over 30+ PER, while Duncan has 2 league mvp's.
MJ, Magic, Shaq, Duncan are the only 4 guys with 3+ Finals MVP's.
1b. Duncan
3. Kobe
Shaq and Duncan both have 3 finals mvp's and Shaq has 1 league MVP with 3 seasons of over 30+ PER, while Duncan has 2 league mvp's.
MJ, Magic, Shaq, Duncan are the only 4 guys with 3+ Finals MVP's.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,570
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Shaq was the best at his peak..Duncan's had the best career, especially since he's still going strong..
Kobe is difficult to ignore, but he hasn't accomplished nearly as much as the other 2..he doesn't even have an MVP(yet)..he needs a title as a #1 option to be in the argument..if KG wins a ring this year, and probably the finals MVP if they win, he could be ahead of Kobe too IMO..
just some stats(not arguing for anybody)..
All-NBA 1st (assuming Kobe and KG get a 1st, and Duncan gets a 2nd this year)
Shaq: 7
Duncan: 8
Kobe: 6
KG: 4
All-NBA 2nd
Shaq: 1
Duncan: 2
Kobe: 2(with 2 3rd teams)
KG: 3(with 2 3rd teams)
All-NBA defense 1st
Shaq: 0(3 2nd teams)
Duncan: 7(2 2nd teams)
Kobe: 5( 2 2nd teams)
KG: 6(2 2nd teams)
MVP
Shaq: 1
Duncan: 2
Kobe: 0
KG: 1
Career PER
Shaq: 27.3(1st among active players)
Duncan: 25.2(2nd among active players)
Kobe: 23.6(8th among active players)
KG: 23.9(6th among active players)
Win Shares
Shaq: 1st among active players
Duncan: 3rd among active players
Kobe: 5th among active players
KG: 2nd among active players
Championships
Shaq: 4(3 as a #1 option, 3 finals MVP)
Duncan: 4(4 as a #1 option, 3 finals MVP)
Kobe: 3(0 as a #1 option, 0 finals MVP)
KG: 0
then of course, you have to talk about Kobe's statistical greatness over the last few years..if you look at MVP voting throughout their post-Jordan careers, Duncan would be at the top of this list, with Shaq close behind..Duncan, Kobe and Garnett have been significantly better than Shaq defensively IMO though..
Kobe is difficult to ignore, but he hasn't accomplished nearly as much as the other 2..he doesn't even have an MVP(yet)..he needs a title as a #1 option to be in the argument..if KG wins a ring this year, and probably the finals MVP if they win, he could be ahead of Kobe too IMO..
just some stats(not arguing for anybody)..
All-NBA 1st (assuming Kobe and KG get a 1st, and Duncan gets a 2nd this year)
Shaq: 7
Duncan: 8
Kobe: 6
KG: 4
All-NBA 2nd
Shaq: 1
Duncan: 2
Kobe: 2(with 2 3rd teams)
KG: 3(with 2 3rd teams)
All-NBA defense 1st
Shaq: 0(3 2nd teams)
Duncan: 7(2 2nd teams)
Kobe: 5( 2 2nd teams)
KG: 6(2 2nd teams)
MVP
Shaq: 1
Duncan: 2
Kobe: 0
KG: 1
Career PER
Shaq: 27.3(1st among active players)
Duncan: 25.2(2nd among active players)
Kobe: 23.6(8th among active players)
KG: 23.9(6th among active players)
Win Shares
Shaq: 1st among active players
Duncan: 3rd among active players
Kobe: 5th among active players
KG: 2nd among active players
Championships
Shaq: 4(3 as a #1 option, 3 finals MVP)
Duncan: 4(4 as a #1 option, 3 finals MVP)
Kobe: 3(0 as a #1 option, 0 finals MVP)
KG: 0
then of course, you have to talk about Kobe's statistical greatness over the last few years..if you look at MVP voting throughout their post-Jordan careers, Duncan would be at the top of this list, with Shaq close behind..Duncan, Kobe and Garnett have been significantly better than Shaq defensively IMO though..
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,757
- And1: 662
- Joined: Jan 27, 2005
- Location: Australia
well shaq is declining really fast,
and duncan is still ground hog day in the league, he be in the league another 5 years, and we see how it all pans out, whether he wins more rings etc....than we can clearly say whose the better out of the two shaq n duncan.
kobe is 3rd.
and duncan is still ground hog day in the league, he be in the league another 5 years, and we see how it all pans out, whether he wins more rings etc....than we can clearly say whose the better out of the two shaq n duncan.
kobe is 3rd.
AJ:"I'm Western Conference," he said. "I'm Popovich. I'm for him, for Texas and for the Spurs."
- lukeridenour
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,263
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 19, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Duncan, look at the spurs record everysince duncan came into the league. never under 55 i believe. playoffs every year and now 4 championships. who can really refute his sucess?
Manu Ginobili:
* Italian League Championship: 2001
* Italian Cup: 2001, 2002
* Euroleague: 2001
* Americas Championship: 2001
* NBA Championship: 2003, 2005, 2007
* Summer Olympic Games gold medal: 2004
* Italian League Championship: 2001
* Italian Cup: 2001, 2002
* Euroleague: 2001
* Americas Championship: 2001
* NBA Championship: 2003, 2005, 2007
* Summer Olympic Games gold medal: 2004
- kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
lukeridenour wrote:Duncan, look at the spurs record everysince duncan came into the league. never under 55 i believe. playoffs every year and now 4 championships. who can really refute his sucess?
Duncan lost to Shaq 4 out of 6 times.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.
Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,469
- And1: 58
- Joined: Feb 24, 2008
-
Heat3 wrote:Best individual player is Kobe. His peak is higher than the other's respective peaks. However Shaq and Duncan have had a much bigger impact on the game than Kobe. Kobe will have to rattle off a few rings on his own to get out of Shaq's shadow. As far as "importance" of players I think it is clearly Shaq.
There was the Jordan era.
There was the Shaq era.
Now it is the Lebron era.
Kobe had the misfortune of coming in and overlapping the primes of other great players. So there is no Kobe era. Same with Duncan although he just keeps winning rings so it doesn't matter
We might be in the Kobe era very soon.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,174
- And1: 565
- Joined: May 31, 2005
- Location: Austin, TX
kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Duncan lost to Shaq 4 out of 6 times.
What are the 4 times in those 6.
Duncan won in 99 and 03
Shaq won in 01, 02, and 04.
Shaq was more dominant that Duncan no question, but Duncan's defensive prowess "might" make up that gap. I don't know, I think I'd pick Shaq because he destroyed the NBA for 5 years, but I'm sure the entire time I had him I'd be looking at Duncan wondering if I'd be better with him instead.
I'm not sure what the hell Kobe Bryant is doing in this discussion. He's never even been the best player in the NBA so how can he be the best player post Jordan.
- milesfides
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,012
- And1: 1,449
- Joined: Nov 09, 2004
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Well, apparently this discussion has moved off the Lakers board, and I was the other party involved.
People talk about Duncan and Shaq as some of the best big men in the game, Duncan as being possibly the greatest power forward to play in the game, and Shaq being one of the most dominant, if not the most dominant center.
But I personally make the distinction, as do many analysts, between best overall basketball player and those who are best at their position.
I have rarely heard or read analysts asserting that Tim Duncan is the best basketball player in the league. Best power forward, best big man, yes. But for the past decade or so, guys like Kobe, T-Mac, Vince (yes, during the days of vinsanity), and Wade and Lebron are discussed when it comes to the best player in the league.
Shaq himself has said on numerous occasions that Kobe is the best player in the league..."by far." Amare Stoudemire said this a couple years ago.
Counting rings is too simplistic, or else Karl Malone, Barkley, and Kevin Garnett are scrubs. Or MVP counts. Steve Nash has two. Dirk has one. Kobe has none. What does that mean? Nothing, except that the MVP doesn't award the best individual basketball player, and neither do championship rings. They're team accolades.
Lastly, when you hear or read this issue being discussed in the media, I think it's indisputable that Kobe Bryant has been regarded as the best basketball player in the league most frequently since Jordan. Vince has faded, T-Mac has faded, Wade has faded, and the discussion is mostly between Lebron and Kobe right now.
Duncan and Shaq were never consistently discussed as being the best basketball players, to my recollection.
People talk about Duncan and Shaq as some of the best big men in the game, Duncan as being possibly the greatest power forward to play in the game, and Shaq being one of the most dominant, if not the most dominant center.
But I personally make the distinction, as do many analysts, between best overall basketball player and those who are best at their position.
I have rarely heard or read analysts asserting that Tim Duncan is the best basketball player in the league. Best power forward, best big man, yes. But for the past decade or so, guys like Kobe, T-Mac, Vince (yes, during the days of vinsanity), and Wade and Lebron are discussed when it comes to the best player in the league.
Shaq himself has said on numerous occasions that Kobe is the best player in the league..."by far." Amare Stoudemire said this a couple years ago.
Counting rings is too simplistic, or else Karl Malone, Barkley, and Kevin Garnett are scrubs. Or MVP counts. Steve Nash has two. Dirk has one. Kobe has none. What does that mean? Nothing, except that the MVP doesn't award the best individual basketball player, and neither do championship rings. They're team accolades.
Lastly, when you hear or read this issue being discussed in the media, I think it's indisputable that Kobe Bryant has been regarded as the best basketball player in the league most frequently since Jordan. Vince has faded, T-Mac has faded, Wade has faded, and the discussion is mostly between Lebron and Kobe right now.
Duncan and Shaq were never consistently discussed as being the best basketball players, to my recollection.
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,837
- And1: 13,615
- Joined: Jan 20, 2007
-
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 810
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 20, 2007
- Location: The Bay
^^^
??? Shaq was considered to be the best in the league up until his Miami days. He was unquestionably the best from the mid 90's to 00's. Think why Shaq is considered top 10 of all-time, high above any active player. Career wise and primewise, Shaq>>>>>>>>>>. Kobe, and everyone would agree on this. Shaq could probably take on Dwight, KG, and TD at once in his prime, and I'm not exaggerating very far at all.
??? Shaq was considered to be the best in the league up until his Miami days. He was unquestionably the best from the mid 90's to 00's. Think why Shaq is considered top 10 of all-time, high above any active player. Career wise and primewise, Shaq>>>>>>>>>>. Kobe, and everyone would agree on this. Shaq could probably take on Dwight, KG, and TD at once in his prime, and I'm not exaggerating very far at all.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,977
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006