Shaq vs Hakeem (Starting a Franchise)

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Shaq vs Hakeem (Starting a Franchise)

Shaq
7
20%
Hakeem
28
80%
 
Total votes: 35

JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,348
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Shaq vs Hakeem (Starting a Franchise) 

Post#1 » by JordansBulls » Wed Mar 5, 2008 8:57 pm

Usually when comparing the two of these guys we usually go by who is better, however who would you take to start a franchise in an all time draft.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Jemini80
Banned User
Posts: 6,437
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

 

Post#2 » by Jemini80 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 9:02 pm

neither, Shaq is 36 and Hakeem is in his 40s.
Blazing_royale
General Manager
Posts: 9,610
And1: 2,649
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Blazing_royale » Wed Mar 5, 2008 9:05 pm

Jemini80 wrote:neither, Shaq is 36 and Hakeem is in his 40s.
Image
Any Pokémon fans out there? Check out my Youtube channel jchucollection
User avatar
J-Mezzy
RealGM
Posts: 22,150
And1: 3,834
Joined: Jan 21, 2004
Location: Orlando

 

Post#4 » by J-Mezzy » Wed Mar 5, 2008 9:44 pm

Superman Howard
User avatar
rrravenred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,115
And1: 583
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Location: Pulling at the loose threads of arguments since 2006

 

Post#5 » by rrravenred » Wed Mar 5, 2008 9:52 pm

Tough call. I think the difference is that you need to build a quite specific team around Shaq to make his team successful.

Hakeem you can surround with role players and still be in the hunt.

Shaq, however, reaches such an offensive peak that he's very tough not to pick him. Hakeem is nearly equal in impact, even though it's spread over both ends of the floor rather than on O.

Probably Hakeem, although I reserve the right to change my mind on a moment's notice.
ElGee wrote:You, my friend, have shoved those words into my mouth, which is OK because I'm hungry.


Got fallacy?
User avatar
J-Mezzy
RealGM
Posts: 22,150
And1: 3,834
Joined: Jan 21, 2004
Location: Orlando

 

Post#6 » by J-Mezzy » Wed Mar 5, 2008 10:00 pm

I'd take Hakeem. Better defender and was the more complete player.
Shaq was such a force in his prime, is tough to go agints him, but Hakeem was just such a smooth big man. I'll never forget the abuse Shaq took from him in the Fianls, Shaq was young d Hakeem was in his prime, but still
Jemini80
Banned User
Posts: 6,437
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

 

Post#7 » by Jemini80 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 10:01 pm

until this question is redeined to say taking them both out of college and starting a franchise with them, any answer is wrong.

*edit*
question is now changed, so I pick Hakeem. IMO he is the better player on both ends of the floor and has far more post moves. Plus, you can't pick against the spin fake master. I feel bad for Hakeem, one of the all-time greats, but he played during the Jordan era.
Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

 

Post#8 » by Myth_Breaker » Wed Mar 5, 2008 11:09 pm

I traditionally answer to this question: Hakeem by a very slight margin. I reckon overall impact of these two is almost identical (also Shaq's prime wasn't really shorter like some people say since Olajuwon perfected his dream moves only like in the beginning of the 90s), so the thing that decides for me is better influence on team chemistry. I mean, look at Diesel's relationship with Penny or Kobe compared to Hakeem's coexistence with Drexler, Pippen or even Barkley. Dream wasn't also such a coach-killer as O'Neal and changed franchise only once. So whom you'd finally trust more while building a team? To me the obvious answer is Hakeem.
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i Konfederację!
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#9 » by kooldude » Thu Mar 6, 2008 1:24 am

J-Mezzy wrote:I'd take Hakeem. Better defender and was the more complete player.
Shaq was such a force in his prime, is tough to go agints him, but Hakeem was just such a smooth big man. I'll never forget the abuse Shaq took from him in the Fianls, Shaq was young d Hakeem was in his prime, but still


Shaq was more efficient shooting than Hakeem and had more bounds and blocks during that Finals; it was Shaq's teammates that let him down.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
Number34
Analyst
Posts: 3,718
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 11, 2005
Location: Kyogle, N.S.W, Australia

 

Post#10 » by Number34 » Thu Mar 6, 2008 1:34 am

Hakeem!
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,562
And1: 25,529
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#11 » by hermes » Thu Mar 6, 2008 2:42 am

hakeem
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

 

Post#12 » by That Nicka » Thu Mar 6, 2008 3:03 am

Shaq
User avatar
Teddy KGB
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

 

Post#13 » by Teddy KGB » Thu Mar 6, 2008 11:15 am

I would take the Diesel. In his prime, nobody, and I mean nobody could stop the Diesel
Formerly ss_maverick, JHos Hydro
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#14 » by Point forward » Thu Mar 6, 2008 11:38 am

I take Shaq. He was unstoppable in his prime AND he would bring many $$$ because he is so popular and open with the media. Ppl often forget that Hakeem was quite a jackass in his early years and dropped off just as badly as Shaq when Dream turned 35.
Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

 

Post#15 » by Myth_Breaker » Thu Mar 6, 2008 11:53 am

Point forward wrote:I take Shaq. He was unstoppable in his prime AND he would bring many $$$ because he is so popular and open with the media. Ppl often forget that Hakeem was quite a jackass in his early years and dropped off just as badly as Shaq when Dream turned 35.


Frankly speaking you don't seem to be very consistent when rating Russell over Wilt and Kareem AND at the same time picking Shaq - lesser Wilt over Olajuwon - lesser Russ, though with better offense . ;-)
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i Konfederację!
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#16 » by Point forward » Thu Mar 6, 2008 12:03 pm

Myth_Breaker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Frankly speaking you don't seem to be very consistent when rating Russell over Wilt and Kareem AND at the same time picking Shaq - lesser Wilt over Olajuwon - lesser Russ, though with better offense . ;-)


Shaq is my guilty pleasure. Ever since he reduced that basket to a pile of rubble, I just dig that guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWOTXSy5qKI

If I am inconsistent with him, I am at least honest about it :D
User avatar
PaKwAn
Analyst
Posts: 3,006
And1: 1,564
Joined: Dec 04, 2007

 

Post#17 » by PaKwAn » Thu Mar 6, 2008 2:34 pm

I would take Hakeem,he has the range has the post moves can defend and can score at will...he was just a complete player and i was in awe on what he did to David Robinson in the playoffs where he left him clueless and stunned.
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,775
And1: 6,184
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

 

Post#18 » by Harry Palmer » Thu Mar 6, 2008 5:46 pm

I'll take the guy who was dominant at both ends over the guy who was dominant at one.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
User avatar
houstonboy01
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,697
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 11, 2005

 

Post#19 » by houstonboy01 » Thu Mar 6, 2008 6:16 pm

Shaq has been traded 3 times and has played with 4 different teams.... Hakeem played his entire career with one team except for his last season... Shaq doest rub me as the type of player that is loved by everyone on the team... Dream on the other hand will make the players around him better.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,222
And1: 31,807
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

 

Post#20 » by tsherkin » Thu Mar 6, 2008 7:39 pm

houstonboy01 wrote:Shaq has been traded 3 times and has played with 4 different teams....


Not to lend support to either side with the comment but of the teams for which Shaq has played, 3 have made the Finals and two have won at least one title. I'd hardly use the fact that he's been traded as a fact of any consequence or significance.

Return to Player Comparisons