Chris Paul on Magic's Level? (Regular Season)
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Chris Paul on Magic's Level? (Regular Season)
- kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Chris Paul on Magic's Level? (Regular Season)
Right now, Paul's PER and Assist rate (with lower TO rate than Magic's best) are already higher than Magic's best PER and Assist rate seasons . Is Chris Paul right now, on Magic's level, judging by the regular season?
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.
Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,467
- And1: 5,348
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,617
- And1: 198
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !
not there yet
?
did that make you feel better?
JordansBulls wrote:Paul is closer to Magic than Kobe to MJ.
?
did that make you feel better?
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:
"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,222
- And1: 31,807
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Chris Paul, close to Magic?
No.
Chris Paul, close to Kevin Johnson?
Hell yes.
Paul is a very good player, an MVP candidate and all that, but he doesn't approach what Magic did on the court. Not in style, not in on-court effect and not yet in terms of performance at the highest of levels.
He needs more time before he can be considered alongside a guy who's top-6.
No.
Chris Paul, close to Kevin Johnson?
Hell yes.
Paul is a very good player, an MVP candidate and all that, but he doesn't approach what Magic did on the court. Not in style, not in on-court effect and not yet in terms of performance at the highest of levels.
He needs more time before he can be considered alongside a guy who's top-6.
- TheKingOfVa360
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,326
- And1: 1,663
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Orange County, California
-
Hell no,
He is almost on Kevin Johnson's level.
For the people saying he is on Zeke's level already you forgot that legends are made in the playoffs. Zeke almost went to 3 straight finals in the golden era. Won back to back championships in the golden era of the NBA.
Paul has yet to get to the playoffs and out the first round.
He is almost on Kevin Johnson's level.
For the people saying he is on Zeke's level already you forgot that legends are made in the playoffs. Zeke almost went to 3 straight finals in the golden era. Won back to back championships in the golden era of the NBA.
Paul has yet to get to the playoffs and out the first round.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,361
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jun 20, 2002
This season, Chris Paul is playing PG as well as anyone that's ever played in the NBA, including Magic and/or Isiah. There's nothing wrong with saying that.
But no, he's not at Magic or Isiah's level yet. He has to extend his regular season success to the playoffs, and he has to do it consistently or get better throughout his career.
But no, he's not at Magic or Isiah's level yet. He has to extend his regular season success to the playoffs, and he has to do it consistently or get better throughout his career.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,469
- And1: 58
- Joined: Feb 24, 2008
-
TheKingOfVa360 wrote:Hell no,
He is almost on Kevin Johnson's level.
For the people saying he is on Zeke's level already you forgot that legends are made in the playoffs. Zeke almost went to 3 straight finals in the golden era. Won back to back championships in the golden era of the NBA.
Paul has yet to get to the playoffs and out the first round.
I don't know much about Kevin Johnson other than game 6 between phx vs bulls in 93.
Chris Paul seems like he's a step ahead of KJ at this point, but I'm just speculating...
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,067
- And1: 22,484
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
I say yes.
Paul is having an historic season. I don't think people are properly recognizing his accomplishments. Let's face it, without Paul, that New Orleans team simply isn't very good. Paul has them vying for the best record in the West when the West is playing its best ball in memory.
Here's how they compare statistically on a pace-adjusted per-40 basis. I'm using Magic's 1986 campaign:
Statistically, it's pretty much a wash. Magic has slightly better numbers, but Paul's higher PER is probably an indication that it's simply harder to achieve high numbers in today's NBA. The PER score is saying that Paul is superior to his contemporaries by a greater margin that Magic was superior to his. And I'd argue that Paul is a better defensive player as well. Paul also plays an additional minute per game. Over the course of the regular season, I don't see why it's so blasphemous to say that Paul is comparable to Magic, or even a touch better.
That said, what made Magic great was his postseason performances and his overall clutchness. And also the fact that he did it for so many years. But if Paul can continue to put up these kinds of numbers with this kind of winning percentage, and then keep it up in the playoffs, I don't see any reason why he can't one day be considered the greatest point guard of all time.
Those are big ifs though. All I'm saying is that Paul is on track to rival Magic. He's got to do in the postseason now.
Paul is having an historic season. I don't think people are properly recognizing his accomplishments. Let's face it, without Paul, that New Orleans team simply isn't very good. Paul has them vying for the best record in the West when the West is playing its best ball in memory.
Here's how they compare statistically on a pace-adjusted per-40 basis. I'm using Magic's 1986 campaign:
Code: Select all
Player PTS REB AST STL BLK TO eFG% TS% PER
johnson,magi 25.8 6.8 13.2 1.9 0.5 4.0 .525 .602 26.8
paul,chris 23.7 4.3 12.3 3.0 0.0 2.8 .534 .582 28.8
Statistically, it's pretty much a wash. Magic has slightly better numbers, but Paul's higher PER is probably an indication that it's simply harder to achieve high numbers in today's NBA. The PER score is saying that Paul is superior to his contemporaries by a greater margin that Magic was superior to his. And I'd argue that Paul is a better defensive player as well. Paul also plays an additional minute per game. Over the course of the regular season, I don't see why it's so blasphemous to say that Paul is comparable to Magic, or even a touch better.
That said, what made Magic great was his postseason performances and his overall clutchness. And also the fact that he did it for so many years. But if Paul can continue to put up these kinds of numbers with this kind of winning percentage, and then keep it up in the playoffs, I don't see any reason why he can't one day be considered the greatest point guard of all time.
Those are big ifs though. All I'm saying is that Paul is on track to rival Magic. He's got to do in the postseason now.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,778
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
- Location: Rest In Peace Dad
- Contact:
-
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,986
- And1: 45,221
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
No doubt Magic was blessed with an outstanding supporting cast, but he was still dominating and producing at a Hall of Fame level well after Kareem had faded and finally retired.
I think Paul is having an absolutely phenomenal season. But this comparison is drastically premature. Echoing what Nate said, Chris has had one, maybe two, Hall-of-Fame seasons. Magic had 12, not to mention all his heroics in the postseason.
He needs to put in a lot more work to be mentioned in the same breath.
I think Paul is having an absolutely phenomenal season. But this comparison is drastically premature. Echoing what Nate said, Chris has had one, maybe two, Hall-of-Fame seasons. Magic had 12, not to mention all his heroics in the postseason.
He needs to put in a lot more work to be mentioned in the same breath.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,528
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 06, 2005
- Location: NYC
TheKingOfVa360 wrote:Hell no,
He is almost on Kevin Johnson's level.
For the people saying he is on Zeke's level already you forgot that legends are made in the playoffs. Zeke almost went to 3 straight finals in the golden era. Won back to back championships in the golden era of the NBA.
Paul has yet to get to the playoffs and out the first round.
In terms of accomplishment, ofcourse he's not on Isiah's level, but then there'd be no point in comparing young studs to legends in the first place... But when you look at the impact that CP3 makes on the game, it's hard not to say he's near Isiah.