RealGM

Who is the better player?

My opinion, Mitch is a better all around player. He can create his own shot a little bit better.

But Glen, that boy can light it up when he's on fire. Great back to the basket player to.

Who ya'll got?

I think I'd take Mitch. He's more fundamentally sound in all areas as you mentioned. Also, I think he played better defense. Rice had quite a bit of difficulty staying in front of people.

Rice was a better role player. Richmond was more of that Alpha player who couldn't carry a team, sort of like Ricky Davis.

I'd take Mitch in a heartbeat. Rice was a great scorer but Mitch played on both ends of the court and could create for other players as well.

Mitch could do a lot more than Rice.

Mitch was a better player.

DelaneyRudd wrote:Rice was a better role player. Richmond was more of that Alpha player who couldn't carry a team, sort of like Ricky Davis.

I know what you meant but.. how dare you even put those two in the same sentence.

lol

Mitch easily. Rice is the better shooter, but that's it, and it's not by much, considering that Mitch was no slouch in that department.

mitchweber wrote:Mitch easily. Rice is the better shooter, but that's it, and it's not by much, considering that Mitch was no slouch in that department.

I agree, no need to elaborate more.

depends on my team needs.
If i need a 3pt specialist to spread the floor- Rice.
If i need the best all around player- Mitch.

People are exaggerating Mitch's defense which was that much better than Glen's. What they should have argued is that Mitch was much better as a passer and had a longer peak.

But yeah, I will take Mitch Richmond.

Mitch was better, but I was always a big Rice fan. I really want to say him, but I can't.

I love Mitch to death, grew up watching him. But I gotta tell you. When Rice was hot, he was more scarier than Mitch I believe.