Page 1 of 1
Rodney Stuckey vs. Darko Milicic
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:27 am
by Ray Allen Iverson
2006, Milicic was traded for Orlando's 2007 first-round pick. Considering team needs and cap considerations: Would Memphis and Detroit swap those players for good or bad?
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:42 pm
by NetsForce
Detroit would get better Memphis would get worse.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:39 pm
by Cammo101
Memphis has no bigs aside from Darko, so they would not even consider it. Stucky has done nothing to show me I would rather have him than Darko.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:04 pm
by Liqourish
Stuckey>Darko.
I loved Darko when he was on the Pistons. I saw the potential he had and would flash from time to time. However, that potential will never be realized due to a poor work ethic and attitude.
Darko has the physical tools to be a great player, but he's lazy, stubborn and arrogant.
Rodney Stuckey has played a total of 48 games and is already a better investment than Darko has ever been.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:13 pm
by a-rod
Liqourish wrote:Stuckey>Darko.
I loved Darko when he was on the Pistons. I saw the potential he had and would flash from time to time. However, that potential will never be realized due to a poor work ethic and attitude.
Darko has the physical tools to be a great player, but he's lazy, stubborn and arrogant.
Rodney Stuckey has played a total of 48 games and is already a better investment than Darko has ever been.
Plus he's that talented, i take Rodney Stuckey.....
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:05 am
by Pats19andO
Dorko sux. Stucky FTW
Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 10:21 am
by Young_Star11
Detroit don't need Darko; they have Amir Johnson.
Stuckey could be a solid combo guard in a couple of years.