Page 1 of 1

Rodney Stuckey vs. Darko Milicic

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:27 am
by Ray Allen Iverson
2006, Milicic was traded for Orlando's 2007 first-round pick. Considering team needs and cap considerations: Would Memphis and Detroit swap those players for good or bad?

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:42 pm
by NetsForce
Detroit would get better Memphis would get worse.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:39 pm
by Cammo101
Memphis has no bigs aside from Darko, so they would not even consider it. Stucky has done nothing to show me I would rather have him than Darko.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:04 pm
by Liqourish
Stuckey>Darko.

I loved Darko when he was on the Pistons. I saw the potential he had and would flash from time to time. However, that potential will never be realized due to a poor work ethic and attitude.

Darko has the physical tools to be a great player, but he's lazy, stubborn and arrogant.

Rodney Stuckey has played a total of 48 games and is already a better investment than Darko has ever been.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:13 pm
by a-rod
Liqourish wrote:Stuckey>Darko.

I loved Darko when he was on the Pistons. I saw the potential he had and would flash from time to time. However, that potential will never be realized due to a poor work ethic and attitude.

Darko has the physical tools to be a great player, but he's lazy, stubborn and arrogant.

Rodney Stuckey has played a total of 48 games and is already a better investment than Darko has ever been.

Plus he's that talented, i take Rodney Stuckey.....

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:05 am
by Pats19andO
Dorko sux. Stucky FTW

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 10:21 am
by Young_Star11
Detroit don't need Darko; they have Amir Johnson.

Stuckey could be a solid combo guard in a couple of years.