Wade + Beasley or Paul + David West ?

IggyTheBEaST · Post #1 » by **IggyTheBEaST** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:56 pm

Paul is one of the best Pgs in the league and him and David West have one of the best chemistries in the league. However, Wade, who is also a top young player in the league, quite possibly will get help from colleges top prospect. What Young Tandem do you think you would take?

Kabookalu · Post #2 » by **Kabookalu** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:04 pm

At first glance Wade and Beasley sounds more appealing. But then putting more thought into it, West is already an all star, Paul is having one of the best seasons for a point guard, Beasley is still unproven, and Wade now has these injury concerns riddling around him and isn't exactly young compared to Paul. I'll take Paul+West.

Blazing_royale · Post #3 » by **Blazing_royale** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:13 pm

Paul+West, Paul is the best young point guard in the league right now and add to the fact that West, who is an allstar already its pretty easy. BTW West is also pretty big and built and ain't no one of those dam skinny ass PF. He can post and shoot the midrange, pretty deadly.

DBurks2818 · Post #4 » by **DBurks2818** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:35 pm

Paul and West right now, (hopefully)Healthy Prime D-Wade and Beasley in two years.

d-will8 · Post #5 » by **d-will8** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:58 pm

Given that Wade has got injury issues and that Beasley hasn't proven anything in the NBA, you'd have to take Paul and West for now. That being said, if Wade can get healthy and stay healthy, people will remember why he had a legitimate case for being the best player from the 2003 draft not much more than a year ago and Beasley's upside is considerably higher than West's.

Post #6 » by **Young_Star11** » Tue Apr 1, 2008 10:18 am

I'd take the established guys...