Which Scenario Would you Prefer for Your Team?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Which Scenario Would you Prefer for Your Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,466
- And1: 5,345
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
Which Scenario Would you Prefer for Your Team?
If your team is in the NBA Finals, which scenario would you rather see?
OPTION A
Your Team is behind 3-2 in the finals but you have HOME-Court Advantage, and you would have Games 6 & 7 at HOME.
Or
OPTION B
Your Team is behind 0-2 in the series and you are the ROAD Team, but you have games 3, 4 and 5 at HOME followed by games 6 and 7 on the ROAD?
NOTE: In both scenarios both teams are equal,
(i.e) Detroit vs Spurs in 2005
OPTION A
Your Team is behind 3-2 in the finals but you have HOME-Court Advantage, and you would have Games 6 & 7 at HOME.
Or
OPTION B
Your Team is behind 0-2 in the series and you are the ROAD Team, but you have games 3, 4 and 5 at HOME followed by games 6 and 7 on the ROAD?
NOTE: In both scenarios both teams are equal,
(i.e) Detroit vs Spurs in 2005

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,812
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Option B easily. A is one game from elimination. Backs against the wall. Nearly dead. Best case scenario is a game 7 win.
Option B is a situation where you just need to protect home court and carry that momentum into Game 6. Best case scenario is wrapping it up in game 6 like Dallas-Miami.
Option B is a situation where you just need to protect home court and carry that momentum into Game 6. Best case scenario is wrapping it up in game 6 like Dallas-Miami.
"I'm sure they'll jump off the bandwagon. Then when we do get back on top, they're going to want to jump back on, and we're going to tell them there's no more room." - Kobe in March of 2005
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,326
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Bgil wrote:Option B easily.
Uhh no. If you're down 0-2, you're team most likely has serious issues. You still have to play that team twice on the road, which is as good as making it 0-3 if you're even lucky enough to get a win against their homecourt advantage. To win the series you need to win 4 of the next 5 games.
I would rather be in a situation where i only need to win 2 games straight at home.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,466
- And1: 5,345
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
chrice wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Uhh no. If you're down 0-2, you're team most likely has serious issues. You still have to play that team twice on the road, which is as good as making it 0-3 if you're even lucky enough to get a win against their homecourt advantage. To win the series you need to win 4 of the next 5 games.
I would rather be in a situation where i only need to win 2 games straight at home.
Not really. IF the team is a great team how could they have issues. It would be like if the Spurs played the Celtics in the finals this year. If the Celtics go up 2-0 on them, it doesn't mean that the Spurs are bad, it just means Boston is good at home.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,466
- And1: 5,345
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
Flash3 wrote:Didn't you have this scenario a few months ago?
Nope, it was different.
I believe I had would you rather be up 3-2 with games 6 and 7 on the road, or would you rather be down 3-2 with games 6 and 7 at home.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,746
- And1: 398
- Joined: Jun 12, 2007
- Location: Grand Rapids
-
- ponder276
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,075
- And1: 67
- Joined: Oct 14, 2007
FIRST GAME:
Option A: have home court advantage, if you lose you're done. If you are evenly matched with your opponent, but have home court, let's say you have a roughly 53% chance of winning the first game.
Option B: don't have home court advantage, and if you lose you're down 3-0. No NBA team has ever come back from being down 3-0 in a playoff series, EVER. Let's say you have a 47% chance of winning the first game (no home court), and if you go down 3-0, you still have a 3% chance of winning the series (these are just estimated probabilities, but are probably roughly correct)
REST OF SERIES:
Option A: at this point, you just have to win 1 game, and you have home court advantage. With home court you have a roughly 53% chance of winning the series at this point
Option B: you must win 3 of the next 4, and there is essentially no home court advantage for either team. If each team has a 50% shot at winning each game, I calculated your chance of winning the series to be 31.25%
COMBINED:
Option A: ~28.1% chance of winning if you are down 3-2 (0.53*0.53)
Option B: ~17.7% chance of winning if you are down 2-0 (0.47*0.3125 + 0.03)
So option A is substantially better. They're only equal if you have an 13.4% chance of coming back from a 3-0 deficit (instead of the 3% chance that I estimated), which is clearly not the case, as no NBA team has ever done it.
Option A: have home court advantage, if you lose you're done. If you are evenly matched with your opponent, but have home court, let's say you have a roughly 53% chance of winning the first game.
Option B: don't have home court advantage, and if you lose you're down 3-0. No NBA team has ever come back from being down 3-0 in a playoff series, EVER. Let's say you have a 47% chance of winning the first game (no home court), and if you go down 3-0, you still have a 3% chance of winning the series (these are just estimated probabilities, but are probably roughly correct)
REST OF SERIES:
Option A: at this point, you just have to win 1 game, and you have home court advantage. With home court you have a roughly 53% chance of winning the series at this point
Option B: you must win 3 of the next 4, and there is essentially no home court advantage for either team. If each team has a 50% shot at winning each game, I calculated your chance of winning the series to be 31.25%
COMBINED:
Option A: ~28.1% chance of winning if you are down 3-2 (0.53*0.53)
Option B: ~17.7% chance of winning if you are down 2-0 (0.47*0.3125 + 0.03)
So option A is substantially better. They're only equal if you have an 13.4% chance of coming back from a 3-0 deficit (instead of the 3% chance that I estimated), which is clearly not the case, as no NBA team has ever done it.