Page 1 of 1

Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:19 am
by magicfan4life05
We all know who the better player is now, but who do you think will be the better pg and player in the future?

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:38 am
by NetsForce
Rondo.

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:16 am
by jab
J J Reddick is going to be >>>>>>>>>> than both of them


BTW Stuckey plays the 1 and the 2

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:48 am
by bstein14
Stuckey is more of a Combo guard. I think Stuckey has more "offensive potential" than Rondo does but its hard to go against Rondo in this because he's more proven.

Also, with Billups and RIP in front of him Stuckey may not have the opportunity to play 30+ MPG in the near future.

Rondo should certainly win this poll.

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:17 am
by OhMyBosh
Rondo by a fair margin.

The only thing Stuckey might have on Rondo is offensive potential. But that's just potential. It means nothing if they don't work hard.

Everything else, easily Rondo.

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:56 am
by That Nicka
RONDO

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:50 pm
by EvadedHavoc
Rondo. But who knows maybe Stuckey might turn into something awesome.

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:31 pm
by Liqourish
You're going to compare a pure PG who gets the benefit of playing with 3 future HoFers to a rookie combo guard who won't see 30+ minutes for at least another 2 years? :crazy:

That's like comparing Daequan Cook to Chris Paul. Although Chris Paul is a much better player than Rondo... you get the point.

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:52 am
by magicfan4life05
After watching these two players in the playoffs, I pose the question again:


magicfan4life05 wrote:We all know who the better player is now, but who do you think will be the better pg and player in the future?

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:37 am
by miller31time
I don't know how fair this. Stuckey is a shoot-first combo guard, so pitting him against a pure, pass-first point guard makes it hard to give an accurate response.

I think Rondo has more potential because, if he adapts a jumpshot, he can control the game in so many ways (scoring, rebounding, passing, defending). But Stuckey showed me a lot this year. He will, IMO, be a far better scorer than Rondo will become, but that is (as mentioned) just one part of the game.

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:17 pm
by NetsForce
Stuckey. Rondo was a HUGE liability for a large portion of these playoffs, he was easily the weakest link for the Celtics...

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:58 pm
by wigglestrue
NetsForce wrote:Stuckey. Rondo was a HUGE liability for a large portion of these playoffs, he was easily the weakest link for the Celtics...


:rofl:

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:38 pm
by CBS7
From what we've seen, easily Rondo.

Also, Stuckey shot 37% in the playoffs.

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:59 pm
by Gant
I really think they're very different players. Stuckey's much more of a combo guard. It's unfair to Stuckey to compare him to Rondo as a point. Stuckey's best skills fall into a different category.

Re: Rondo vs. Stuckey

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:03 pm
by Gant
NetsForce wrote:Stuckey. Rondo was a HUGE liability for a large portion of these playoffs, he was easily the weakest link for the Celtics...


This is the opposite of what every one of his opponents and teammates have stated, most recently Phil Jackson who said he was the most important player in determining the deciding game.