Mac vs. Roy
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Mac vs. Roy
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,205
- And1: 5
- Joined: May 14, 2005
Mac vs. Roy
Who would you rather have? Personally I would rather have Roy. I think he plays beyond his years like Wade and with poise and control. I think he brings a winning personality with him. I was impressed by the Blazers' early run and Roy was heavily influential in it. Roy and Oden will take this team back into the playoffs every year. Book it.
- Baller 24
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,637
- And1: 19
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Tmac>Roy now, and forever. The OP, think about it like this, switch both players on each others teams. Roy is on the Rockets that is injury prone and without Yao. Tmac is with the Blazers. So which team makes it to the playoffs and wins 50+ games? The Rockets who have Roy minus Yao, or the Blazers who have Tmac?
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
- farzi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,485
- And1: 5
- Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Baller 24 wrote:Tmac>Roy now, and forever. The OP, think about it like this, switch both players on each others teams. Roy is on the Rockets that is injury prone and without Yao. Tmac is with the Blazers. So which team makes it to the playoffs and wins 50+ games? The Rockets who have Roy minus Yao, or the Blazers who have Tmac?
Neither.
And T-Mac at his best right now is better than Roy at his best right now. However, in 2-3 years, that won't be the case. However, T-mac's prime > Roy's prime.
Also, Roy will never put up stats similar to those of T-Mac's. Roy is more a team first guy, and is playing on a more balanced roster
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
- Baller 24
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,637
- And1: 19
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Neither.
And T-Mac at his best right now is better than Roy at his best right now. However, in 2-3 years, that won't be the case. However, T-mac's prime > Roy's prime.
Also, Roy will never put up stats similar to those of T-Mac's. Roy is more a team first guy, and is playing on a more balanced roster
Agreed. I see Roy as a smaller in size and quicker version of Grant Hill. Note I saw smaller in size because I don't think the guy can rebound like Hill, but he has the capability of putting up 22pts, 7 ast, and 5reb.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
- etopn23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,072
- And1: 160
- Joined: Feb 05, 2006
You realize McGrady is 28 and will only be 30-31 in 2-3 years? The back problems are behind him.... the chances of Roy being better than him any time soon are slim to none.farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Neither.
And T-Mac at his best right now is better than Roy at his best right now. However, in 2-3 years, that won't be the case. However, T-mac's prime > Roy's prime.
Also, Roy will never put up stats similar to those of T-Mac's. Roy is more a team first guy, and is playing on a more balanced roster
- farzi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,485
- And1: 5
- Joined: Dec 20, 2007
etopn23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
You realize McGrady is 28 and will only be 30-31 in 2-3 years? The back problems are behind him.... the chances of Roy being better than him any time soon are slim to none.
He's gotten worse over the past few years, and while still one of the best, he's a shadow of him former self. That's largely due to injuries, and he may well never have those problems again, but how can you say the chances of him having another flare up are slim to none when the past says differently?
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
- candy for lunch
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,583
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Cruel_Ruin
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,091
- And1: 767
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
- Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
-
- Storm Surge
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,024
- And1: 17
- Joined: Dec 27, 2004
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Cruel_Ruin wrote:What a joke of a comparison. Is there anything Roy does better than Tmac? Maybe in 3-4 years when Tmac slows down, but seriously, this is ridiculous.
roy may be a better pure shooter than t-mac but yeah this comparison is bad.
T-Mac should be compared to Wade, Carmelo, and when he is at his best(like game 6), Kobe.
- farzi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,485
- And1: 5
- Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Storm Surge wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
roy may be a better pure shooter than t-mac but yeah this comparison is bad.
T-Mac should be compared to Wade, Carmelo, and when he is at his best(like game 6), Kobe.
He should be...if this was 2003
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
- Basileus777
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,822
- And1: 2,051
- Joined: Jul 13, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
-
- Milkdud
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,095
- And1: 137
- Joined: May 21, 2001
- Location: Dreaming of Australia
man im getting sick of seeing all of these polls with Roy facing off vs established guards. I guy is progressing nicely but its in his 2nd season for god sake. How bout we let him play acouple more before you try to take on a guy like Mac who has been putting up big time numbers for quite awhile. Honestly the only way you can take Roy is if you are making an argument for starting a new team. Mac a more gifted athlete and is wired to be a much more gifted scorer at this point.
The thing that really gets me ticked off is people are tossing out young blazer players vs vets and the posters are not people ive ever seen on the portland board in my time. Then pretty much everyone jumps in and goes " jeeze portland fans are crazy, they overrate all there players.. blah blah blah". You know what im sure we do to some degree but Im also pretty damn sure people make these threads to enable pot shots at a team and to bait some of the more foolish fans.
The thing that really gets me ticked off is people are tossing out young blazer players vs vets and the posters are not people ive ever seen on the portland board in my time. Then pretty much everyone jumps in and goes " jeeze portland fans are crazy, they overrate all there players.. blah blah blah". You know what im sure we do to some degree but Im also pretty damn sure people make these threads to enable pot shots at a team and to bait some of the more foolish fans.
- Storm Surge
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,024
- And1: 17
- Joined: Dec 27, 2004
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact: