Page 1 of 1
Grant Hill vs Scottie Pippen
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 3:42 am
by Alex_De_Large
overall we would take Pippen obviously, but let's choose the best in his best season, which was better?
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 3:43 am
by BirdIsDaKing
scottie
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 4:17 am
by Harry Palmer
Whoo.
Really, really, really tough. One leans more towards D, one towards O.
On balance, I'd say that Hill at his best was better than Pippen at his best, but it's damn close. Depends on whether or not you need a lead scorer, I guess. If you do, Hill. If not, Pippen, but either can actually do the other role too.
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 4:33 am
by BirdIsDaKing
Harry Palmer wrote:Whoo.
Really, really, really tough. One leans more towards D, one towards O.
On balance, I'd say that Hill at his best was better than Pippen at his best, but it's damn close. Depends on whether or not you need a lead scorer, I guess. If you do, Hill. If not, Pippen, but either can actually do the other role too.
Id like to see what a prime grant could do with the team pippen had in 1994, with a rookie toni kukoc as your second option.
scottie.
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 5:26 am
by Warspite
If you watched them play head to head you would see it realy is no contest. Of course if you watch MJ and Hill play head to head you might think Hill was better to.
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 8:37 am
by tkb
Peak Hill was better IMO.
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 9:24 am
by shawngoat23
Definitely Scottie for me.
Posted: Thu May 8, 2008 11:06 pm
by Pats19andO
Gotta go with Grant,guy was putting up huge numbers as a rookie. Wish I couldve seen his prime?
Posted: Fri May 9, 2008 12:27 am
by BirdIsDaKing
you did
Posted: Fri May 9, 2008 6:25 pm
by Hard2dhole
If it wasn't for his injury I'd would expect this would be a runaway for Hill. Hill's peak was nearer Jordan then Pippen.
Posted: Fri May 9, 2008 6:27 pm
by The_Believer
^^^Agreed. Hill was supposed to be Jordan V2, and he was living up to his hype. If not for his injury, he'd be a legend.