Here's a comparison I thought of:
Per 36 numbers for Dwight Howard (first 4 years)
1. 13.2 pts - 11.1 reb - 1.0 stl - 1.8 blk
2. 15.4 pts - 12.2 reb - 0.8 stl - 1.4 blk
3. 17.2 pts - 12.0 reb - 0.8 stl - 1.9 blk
4. 19.8 pts - 13.5 reb - 0.9 stl - 2.1 blk
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... rdw01.html
Per 36 numbers for Roy Tarpley (first 4 years)
1. 14.4 pts - 13.7 reb - 1.4 stl - 2.0 blk
2. 17.1 pts - 15.0 reb - 1.6 stl - 1.3 blk
3. 20.0 pts - 13.3 reb - 1.7 stl - 1.8 blk
4. 16.6 pts - 12.9 reb - 1.7 stl - 1.5 blk
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... lro01.html
After those four seasons of course, Tarpley flamed out. He played 5 games in year 5, then was suspended and out of the league for 3 full years. He came back at age 30 in 94/95 and put up 12.6 and 8.2 in 24.6 minutes per game before again being suspended. Such a waste of potential.
How good would this guy have been?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
How good would this guy have been?
- bluestang302
- Senior
- Posts: 746
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007