Page 1 of 2
Extremely early and probably pointless Rooks v Sohphomore
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:07 pm
by farzi
Rose
Mayo
Bayless (?)
Beasley
Oden
vs
Conley
Durant
Green
Yi
Horford
_________
Talent wise, I say rookies win, but as we've all seen, they usually hit that Rookie wall, while Sophomores are more accustomed to the longer season.
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:22 pm
by UNC4215
Young > Green
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 2:23 am
by GLtrojans
Rookies. Rose and Beasley are potential HOFs and Oden is gonna be great with the Blazers while the Sophomores only have Durant (another possible HOF) and Horford. The rest are not special like those three players. Bayless also has the chance to be a great starter for any lottery team.
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 10:59 am
by Young_Star11
I'll take the Sophs. Did the 03 Rookies lose too?
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 11:35 am
by ITK9
did i just saw a sophomore team without thadeus young?
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 11:40 am
by farzi
ITK9 wrote:did i just saw a sophomore team without thadeus young?
Ok, switch Young with Green, does it make that much of a difference?
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 1:50 pm
by T-Spot
I know technically Oden is a rook next season, but its unfair to put him on the rookie squad as he was the #1 pick in this season's draft. I mean, you basically gave away the best player on the soph squad to the rooks.
Conley
Durant
Moon
Horford
Oden
Would have been my soph team. Shift Hortford to C and put in Young at PF if Oden can't be used by the soph's I guess but he shouldn't be given to the rooks.
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 2:19 pm
by farzi
T-Spot wrote:I know technically Oden is a rook next season, but its unfair to put him on the rookie squad as he was the #1 pick in this season's draft. I mean, you basically gave away the best player on the soph squad to the rooks.
Conley
Durant
Moon
Horford
Oden
Would have been my soph team. Shift Hortford to C and put in Young at PF if Oden can't be used by the soph's I guess but he shouldn't be given to the rooks.
That's good and all, but since Oden will be considered a rookie next year, he'd be playing for the rookie team.
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:24 pm
by TradeMachine
Bayless @SF?
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:52 pm
by farzi
TradeMachine wrote:Bayless @SF?
It was mostly the fact that he's supposed to be real good, but there isn't a top flight SF in the draft (if Beasley is playing PF here) to start over him
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:12 pm
by GoBobcats
Are you kidding me ?
This is not even close.
Rose
Mayo
Bayless (?)
Beasley
Oden
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:47 pm
by Wade2k6
Alright to make this more fair i'd go with a lineup of
Conley
Durant
Moon/Young/Green (whichever one you prefer)
Horford
Oden
vs.
Rose
Mayo
Beasley
Lopez
Rose > Conley
Mayo < Durant
Randolph/Greene = (any of the three)
Beasley > Horford
Lopez < Oden
I'll take rookies. In a real game their depth would show, they're a deeper class then the sophomores
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 9:02 pm
by farzi
Wade2k6 wrote:Alright to make this more fair i'd go with a lineup of
Conley
Durant
Moon/Young/Green (whichever one you prefer)
Horford
Oden
vs.
Rose
Mayo
Beasley
Lopez
Rose > Conley
Mayo < Durant
Randolph/Greene = (any of the three)
Beasley > Horford
Lopez < Oden
I'll take rookies. In a real game their depth would show, they're a deeper class then the sophomores
Oden would be on the Rookie team.
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 9:57 pm
by ISB
you guys realize he is talking about the rookie sophomore game next season, right? Not long term potential.
Sophs will win in a blowout like they almost always do, Oden or not.
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 10:06 pm
by J~Rush
Wade2k6 wrote:Alright to make this more fair i'd go with a lineup of
Conley
Durant
Moon/Young/Green (whichever one you prefer)
Horford
Oden
vs.
Rose
Mayo
Beasley
Lopez
Rose > Conley
Mayo < Durant
Randolph/Greene = (any of the three)
Beasley > Horford
Lopez < Oden
I'll take rookies. In a real game their depth would show, they're a deeper class then the sophomores
Oden'll be a rook next season.
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:38 am
by Joseph17
The rookies are better.
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 1:21 am
by princeofpalace
Better teams
Rookies
G-Rose, G-Mayo, SF-Galinari, PF-Beasley, C-Oden
Bench: G-Fernandez, PF-Splitter,
Sophmores: PG-Conley, G-Stuckey, F-Durant, F-Young, C-Horford
Bench: SG-N. Young, F-Thorton,
As usual the sophmores win it
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 2:18 am
by ISB
princeofpalace wrote:Better teams
Rookies
G-Rose, G-Mayo, SF-Galinari, PF-Beasley, C-Oden
Bench: G-Fernandez, PF-Splitter,
Sophmores: PG-Conley, G-Stuckey, F-Durant, F-Young, C-Horford
Bench: SG-N. Young, F-Thorton,
As usual the sophmores win it
for such a team I'd say (remember I'm just talking about next season):
PG: Conley > Rose (Especially in an all star game where defense is not a factor, but I'd probably take Conley over Rose for just next season anyway.)
SG: Stuckey > Mayo
SF - Durant > Galinari
PF - Young < Beasley
C - Horford = Oden
Bench
Young < Fernandez
Thornton > Splitter
Hence, sophomore blowout as usual.
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 2:52 am
by The_Believer
The rookie team needs some more Brook Lopez. He'll contribute to any team immediately.
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 5:37 am
by Cashville_33
It's funny how people hype up a particular draft and then after three months, call the draft class a bust because the players didn't meet the unrealistic expectations.
Those who believe the 08 draft is better (and deeper) then the 07 class will be very disappointed.
Anyways the more experienced sophomores will easily take this one with Horford winning MVP.