Page 1 of 1
Which team is better?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 6:00 pm
by randomhero423
Team 1: Andre Miller/Steve Blake- Raja Bell/Luther Head- Paul Pierce/Jerry Stackhouse- Chris Bosh/Glen Davis- Chris Kaman/Kendrick Perkins
or
Team 2: Andre Miller/Steve Blake - Raja Bell/Luther Head - Paul Pierce/Jerry Stackhouse - Kevin Garnett/Glen Davis - Kendrick Perkins/Aaron Grey
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 6:20 pm
by NO-KG-AI
the one with KG.
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 6:29 pm
by SOUL
I'd say the one with Bosh.. Kaman is way better than Aaron Grey. KG is better than Bosh.. but not by much, well defensively yes but still I think team 1 would be better
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 6:33 pm
by NO-KG-AI
Soul wrote:I'd say the one with Bosh.. Kaman is way better than Aaron Grey. KG is better than Bosh.. but not by much, well defensively yes but still I think team 1 would be better
Rly?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 7:07 pm
by Kosta
Have to go with the K.G led team, after seeing what he's been able to do with Boston this season, no question got to take him over Bosh/Kaman. And Perkins isn't that far off defensively to Kaman.
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 7:36 pm
by RoyceDa59
KG. The interior defense simply isn't there with Bosh and Kaman.
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 7:38 pm
by Baller 24
Soul wrote:I'd say the one with Bosh.. Kaman is way better than Aaron Grey. KG is better than Bosh.. but not by much, well defensively yes but still I think team 1 would be better

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:07 pm
by Ballings7
Kevin Garnett squad
KG > Bosh
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:10 am
by SOUL
Offensively Bosh is on par with KG.. obviously KG is better than him defensively.. still I think the gap between Kaman and Gray is way more noticible.. you guys are acting like a team of big men (Bosh, Perkins, Kaman) would be weak defensively.. the other spots are already good,a nd while KG would make it a GREAT team defensively .. Bosh's team isnt a slouch (since its the same damn team!)
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:23 am
by NO-KG-AI
Well Garnett is so much easier to run an offense through because his offense is much more varied than driving from the baseline to draw fouls, or setting up the jumper. He is also a top 5 passing 7 footer ever IMO.... that's invaluable.
Garnett is a lot more versatile on offense, which is why he isn't neutralized as easy as Bosh is by certain defenders. He can face up and drive like Bosh, shoot jumpers, but he can also get down low and dominate the post(like he is doing Detroit right now).
Bosh is a beast driving to the rim though.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:58 am
by Albanian Damien
It's basically KG vs. Kaman/Bosh. KG without a hesitation.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:40 am
by 6ixSideSniper
I'd take Kaman and Bosh over KG.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:59 am
by chrice
^ Ditto. I think I'd prefer two really good players to 1 great and 1 so-so player. Went with Kaman/Bosh over KG/Gray. Kaman this season was awesome.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 10:34 pm
by zong
HA! I see what you're trying to do here

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 10:38 pm
by ITK9
Vt_Mc wrote:I'd take Kaman and Bosh over KG.
+1
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:16 pm
by NO-KG-AI
So the Celtics would be a better team with Bosh and Kaman instead of KG right now? I find that hard to believe.
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:03 am
by SOUL
Kaman/Bosh/Pierce/Allen/Rondo would be a pretty sick lineup..
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 5:09 am
by Ballings7
Four scoring-minded players, though...
The defense and ball-movement wouldn't be the same without KG and Perkins. Not as compatible a team.