Page 1 of 1

Kwame Brown Vs. Michael Olowakandi.

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 2:33 pm
by Puertorique
Which would you rather have on your team? Who is the worst player of the two. Which is the bigger bust?

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 3:10 pm
by Malinhion
I'd rather have Kwame. At least Phil turned him into something servicable. An athletic, rebounding big who's a lock-down man defender. He's expiring this summer, and I don't expect him to get that big of a deal. When he's not on such an atrocious contract I think people might start to look at him more favorably. Sure, he's a bust, but I can see him being a helpful part on a team that already has a frontcourt piece.

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 5:02 pm
by NO-KG-AI
^^ He'd be nice next to Dwight, he can come in and allow Dwight to roam the paint and rebound the basketball.

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:00 pm
by Patterns
Michael. At least he can catch the ball.

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:30 pm
by RJM
Patterns wrote:Michael. At least he can catch the ball.

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 9:02 pm
by shawngoat23
I wouldn't want either, but I'll take Kwame. I hate to say this, but I'll take his pathetic offensive game over Olowokandi, who averaged like 43% from the field for his career. As a big man.

And as crappy as his hands are, he turns the ball over much less than Olowokandi.

Posted: Mon Jun 2, 2008 9:55 pm
by CITYOFANGELSX3
I remember Olowokandi back in 2001. Alvin Gentry was going to him early against shaq. They ended up beating the lakers. Actually Olowokandi did well 1 season before he got a good contract. Then disappeared.