Page 1 of 1
brand vs. brand
Posted: Wed Jul 9, 2008 1:53 am
by dockingsched
miller/iggy/young/brand/dalembert
vs.
davis/e. gordon/thornton/brand/kaman
which team has a better chance of advancing in the playoffs?
which team is better right now?
which team has a better future?
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Wed Jul 9, 2008 2:02 am
by j-ragg
I like the Clippers talent a little more but I like the Sixers more because they're in the East.
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Wed Jul 9, 2008 2:09 am
by Storm Surge
Davis>Miller
Iggy>Gordon
Al=Young
Brand>Brand(JK)
Kaman>Dalembert
It appears LAC has the advantage but since the sixers are in the East I'll take them.
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Wed Jul 9, 2008 2:33 am
by j-ragg
You could've just quoted me.
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Wed Jul 9, 2008 8:58 pm
by Inc
Davis>Miller
Gordan<Iggy
Al=Young
Brand=Brand
Kaman>Dalembert
LAC has the better players but 76ers are in the East, I'll take them
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:29 am
by Alex_De_Large
which team has a better chance of advancing in the playoffs?
West >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> East.
So Sixers > Clipps easily.
which team is better right now?
Really close.
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:03 am
by pillwenney
The talent is quite close IMO but I think the Clippers have the better over all lineup. That sixers lineup has really poor shooting, which, if it's not improved will eventually be their downfall. The Clips lineup wouldn't have any really strong weaknesses like that in terms of one clear skill.
Re: brand vs. brand
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:27 pm
by philly262
You're forgetting the bench players, the Sixers have a much better bench, that fits better than the Clippers bench.
And Al would suck as a role player, since he's only good when he has the ball in his hands.