Jamaaliver wrote:How do we account for that?
I'm not getting into a Hawks-Pacers comparison. Indy isn't as good as their record and have much left to prove. Remind me next year, and we can argue it then. (Although, they will likely be a much better team after the upcoming offseason. They've managed assets well).
As far as Nate, he lowered the variance -- play vet defenders, slow the pace, take what the defense gives you, junk up the paint, take care of the ball, etc. He got a lot of deserved criticism but he also knew how to maximize a roster.
Quin seems to be taking more of a long-term, philosophical path here, and it's costing the team in the short-term. It seems to me that he's trying to establish a high-variance approach, which would have MAJOR upside, but he doesn't currently have enough broadly skilled players for that. The most pressing needs are a defensive cog and some guys who can switch on the perimeter.
Meanwhile, the Hawks roster is full of guys with highly concentrated skills. Murray and Hunter can only guard certain types of players and are not at their best off-ball. Bey is not quick enough defensively, and Capela is starting to fade as a rim deterrent. I still think Bufkin and AJ have promise but, if we're being honest, neither of them have the right skill-set to build around Trae. And I love Bogi, but he is a 6th man or worse for the rest of his contract.
Guards: Trae
Wings: JJ, Bogi
Bigs: OO
^^^That's the short deck the Hawks are playing with, and it really shows late in games. Personally, I support what Quin is trying to do, but I'm beyond annoyed they didn't try harder to refit the roster in the summer.