Game 41: Atlanta VS Phoenix
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
-
Rip2137
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,317
- And1: 228
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
dantian wrote:And, Amare was for the Hawks to take in one KG scenario in the summer and the sorry organization turned it down!
That was a untrue rumour although it is said that had that become available they still wouldn't have taken it. But the Suns definately didn't offer up Amare. They should have but didn't.
-
D21
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,574
- And1: 689
- Joined: Sep 09, 2005
evildallas wrote:A couple games a year nothing clicks and you get blown out. I still have more problems with the Portland loss than the Phoenix game.
That's right, even if this loss is ridiculous.
Marion 19pts with 8 shots
Stoudemire 24pts with 11 shots
Diaw 16 pts (8-10) 9ast 7rbd
...in 27 to 31 minutes.
-
will
- RealGM
- Posts: 52,083
- And1: 50,740
- Joined: Jan 08, 2006
- Location: Pat's Homestyle Jamaican Restaurant. Shouts to Sheryl's Caribbean Cuisine
- Contact:
-
-
JoshB914
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,889
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
dantian wrote:And, Amare was for the Hawks to take in one KG scenario in the summer and the sorry organization turned it down!
That is completely false. Please know your facts.
Since you just believe whatever you read here are the facts. The rumor was that Belkin vetoed the deal. But the Haws ownerhsip (due to his contract length) would have had to have a majority veto the deal. This clearly did not happen as Minny and ATL put the deal together BEFORE proposing it to Phoenix so obviously our owners didnt have an issue.
Phoenix vetoed the deal because they didn't want to deal Amare. And they will pay dearly for it when they have to go through Tim Duncan again (or Tyson Chandler/Davis West).
Hawk bashing is fine with me (this organization deserves it). But please know your basic facts before you come on here with ridiculous statements like that.