I don't think people realize that Chil plays half an hour every night and manages only 2.6 defensive rebounds.
I have repeated that a few times here but then again people may be tuning me out lol.
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
NDaATL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
They are, but they have to devote themselves to it all the time. The Celtics POUNDED us on the glass at home. Rondo/Perkins/KG/Powe got many offensive rebounds against us in Boston it was terrible. We had many letdown games this season with rebounding, very inconsistent. Smith is the X-factor, some games he'd pull in 10+ then the next game he'd have 4 rebounds.
conleyorbust wrote:The reason we lost was because they had a great gameplan to shut down Joe and Josh and turn us into a jumpshooting team in the halfcourt.
My initial point was a response to the suggestion that we need Horford at the 4 and Smith at the 3 because we aren't a good defensive rebounding team. We are a bad defensive rebounding team but not because of that.
tontoz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Childress' assist numbers argue that he doesn't spend much time at the point. And considering our starting 2 is second in the league in minutes played that doesn't leave much time at the 2 for Childress.
They Call Me Cash wrote:What's so good about Marvin that he deserves to start at SF over Josh Smith.. before you answer.. I know the reasoning behind it, but I'm talking about the 2008-2009 Season..
parson wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Smoove's not quick enough to defend 3 (Marvin's much better there defensively). On offense, he can't drive past 3s the way he abuses 4s. And we've all mentioned his jumper.
DonJuanCapistro wrote:I think that with all the D provided by Horford smith and chill that Eddy Curry would fit in very nicely on this roster. Anyone agree?