Hawks Mirror Boston

killbuckner · Post #61 » by **killbuckner** » Thu May 22, 2008 6:57 pm

I GUARANTEE you that if thats the best offer they get then Redd won't be traded. GUARANTEE.

NDaATL · Post #62 » by **NDaATL** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:06 pm

killbuckner wrote:I GUARANTEE you that if thats the best offer they get then Redd won't be traded. GUARANTEE.

Great comeback.

So Hawks fans are wrong, Bucks fans are wrong, we are all idiots and killbuckner is right. At least you are sticking to your guns.

killbuckner · Post #63 » by **killbuckner** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:16 pm

Anyone who thinks that Redd would get traded for Marvin/Bibby is laughably wrong. there is zero chance of that happening.

tontoz · Post #64 » by **tontoz** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:28 pm

killbuckner wrote:Anyone who thinks that Redd would get traded for Marvin/Bibby is laughably wrong. there is zero chance of that happening.

Just like there was no chance of Gasol getting traded for Kwame and scraps.

M301E814W404 · Post #65 » by **M301E814W404** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:30 pm

killbuckner wrote:Anyone who thinks that Redd would get traded for Marvin/Bibby is laughably wrong. there is zero chance of that happening.

I completely disagree, I think that would get the deal done, but I also think it may be too much to give up. The Bucks want to move Redd and his huge salary. I think that We could get Redd for Marvin, Speedy who is an expiring contract, and our first round pick. We may have to throw Zaza in there or something but I do think thet they would definitely take Marvin and Bibby.

By the way that would put Bibby in basketball hell.

Rip2137 · Post #66 » by **Rip2137** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:33 pm

killbuckner wrote:Anyone who thinks that Redd would get traded for Marvin/Bibby is laughably wrong. there is zero chance of that happening.

You are right. High paid guys that teams want to clear off their cap never gets traded for expirings to clear cap space. Ever.

bruno sundov · Post #67 » by **bruno sundov** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:50 pm

Why not jsut take Ray Allen. he is a better defender and more athletic. It's a toss up who is the better shooter between allen and redd.

what do you want to trade for ray Allen?

Rip2137 · Post #68 » by **Rip2137** » Thu May 22, 2008 7:54 pm

because redd is a better shooter than Ray Allen? And can take over the offense if we need to sit Joe for awhile?

tontoz · Post #69 » by **tontoz** » Thu May 22, 2008 8:01 pm

Rip2137 wrote:because redd is a better shooter than Ray Allen? And can take over the offense if we need to sit Joe for awhile?

He is also younger.

CWell · Post #70 » by **CWell** » Thu May 22, 2008 8:03 pm

killbuckner wrote:Anyone who thinks that Redd would get traded for Marvin/Bibby is laughably wrong. there is zero chance of that happening.

lol he CONTINUES to show he has no clue when it comes to the NBA or basketball period.

NDaATL · Post #71 » by **NDaATL** » Thu May 22, 2008 8:04 pm

Ray in his prime was much better than Redd, but after this season and his playoff performance I'd rather have Redd.

killbuckner · Post #72 » by **killbuckner** » Thu May 22, 2008 8:20 pm

Do you all think that Raef Lafrentz, Jarrett Jack, and Martell Webster for Redd is a reasonable offer?

Rip2137 · Post #73 » by **Rip2137** » Thu May 22, 2008 8:56 pm

It would be a good deal for the Bucks but the Blazers wouldn't do it because they need Raef's expiring deal with so many guarenteed contracts and having to resign so many young guys in a few years. Having redd sucking up a big part of the cap would mean they would probably lose someone.

Not to mention the whole either redd or roy would have to be the defensive SF issue.