top 100 players ranked. agree with the hawks rankings?

johnny878 · Post #1 » by **johnny878** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:52 pm

http://www.probasketballnews.com/story/?storyid=709

so you dont have to read,

joe @ 21
Josh @ 42
Al @ 75
Marvin @ 77

personally, i think Joe is too high. And al should also drop a bit while marvin a bit higher

SAUCERY_SWEET · Post #2 » by **SAUCERY_SWEET** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:54 pm

Just glancing thru his rankings i didn't really see anything that would make me :eek1:

or

. The rankings all seemed pretty decent to me. :dontknow:

ATL DirtyBird · Post #3 » by **ATL DirtyBird** » Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:21 am

Al Jefferson at 22 is better than Joe but Joe should still be around there. He brings so much to the table. I guess I can agree with the rest. Nothing to bold.

evildallas · Post #4 » by **evildallas** » Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:31 am

Prior to last year I may have argued that Joe should be higher (around 16) based on overall game, but he's taken a step back on defensive effectiveness. No complaints about the current rankings of the Hawks. The key with the Hawks players is that should not have peaked yet. Al and Josh had down years while Marvin showed the most progress so far.

I have disagreements with some players because he seems to be uneven in how he factors in injury impact.

Harry10 · Post #5 » by **Harry10** » Wed Sep 2, 2009 10:35 am

i agree that Joe does deserve to be on the same level as Billups and Granger. i do think that Joe is a top 5 SG, and on this list he is #4.

Josh is way too low....... he should be up their in the mid 20s with Iguodala, Harris, Butler, Rondo and David West.

i don't think Okafor is that much better than Horford (especially when you take into account Horford's intangibles), so i don't know if Okafor is ranked too high or Hoford is ranked too low. but Al is ranked on the same level as Lopez, Bynum, and Murphy, which is fair, but i think 70s is a slap in the face for all 4 guys.

Marvin ranked with JR Smith, and Stuckey is appropriate.

On Another Note:

Bosh is ranked way too high, come on. Bosh is good, but not great. Bosh resume is the same as Shareef Abdur Rahim, he is a stat stuffer, who can't help a bad team win, and becomes slower in the playoffs. he should really be on the same level as Granger and Joe.

NJ To BK · Post #6 » by **NJ To BK** » Fri Sep 4, 2009 6:17 pm

Stupid list. How the hell is lebron Number 1?

JoshB914 · Post #7 » by **JoshB914** » Fri Sep 4, 2009 8:05 pm

NJ To BK wrote:Stupid list. How the hell is lebron Number 1?

Is this a joke?