Uh, ouch. Can't say that it isn't accurate for the minutes he played, but I'm still hoping some extra minutes will settle him down some. More than anyone else on the team, his ability to play up to the other PG he was drafted around (Jrue, Lawson, Collison, Maynor) will determine if we can be better than last season or not.John Hollinger of espn.com wrote:Jeff Teague
Projection: 13.7 pts, 3.6 reb, 7.0 ast per 40 min; 12.16 PER
• Shoot-first point guard with quick first step who likes to drive to basket.
• Outstanding college shooter who struggled to adjust to pro 3-point line.
• Hyper, high-risk, gambling defender; blocks shots but fouls far too often.
The mutterings from the Hawks after the season were that Teague needed to play more, but I wonder if we were watching the same guy. While he certainly showcased the talent to create shots and defend the position, and he distributed the ball decently enough, he couldn't put the ball in the basket.
The other "ouch" comment from there was that Joe Johnson would have the 3rd best PER after Smoove and Horford. So the guy who got possibly the last $120+ mil contract wouldn't even be better than the guy who's about to be an RFA... 2x ouch.
Anyway, I don't want to rewrite the entire article here, but if there's any particular person that you want a quick synopsis of, I don't mind putting it out there...