ImageImage

Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 54,004
And1: 10,359
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#1 » by HMFFL » Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:30 pm

With Josh Smith's jumper and range improving, what do you think about him starting at the 3 during the future?
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#2 » by Harry10 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:12 am

i have no problem in playing Josh on the perimter for stretches when Zaza or Powel come in.

but Josh is just so great in the post, he is virtually unstopable, not even KG or Dwight can block his shot, it is just a matter of him refining his hook and baby hook shot.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#3 » by azuresou1 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:29 am

I'd be fine with starting Josh as a SF, but I would still feel safer if our C could shoot. Like an Okur.
User avatar
ATL DirtyBird
Starter
Posts: 2,203
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Atlanta: Where the Hawks play hard 26 games a year!

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#4 » by ATL DirtyBird » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:25 am

Harry10 wrote:i have no problem in playing Josh on the perimter for stretches when Zaza or Powel come in.

but Josh is just so great in the post, he is virtually unstopable, not even KG or Dwight can block his shot, it is just a matter of him refining his hook and baby hook shot.

Id say hes effective, not unstoppable. Hes an improving player but doesnt like the post. Drew wants him in the paint but Josh says "No." I could be wrong in that though. Maybe Drew has learned that Josh has a nice little jumper now. I just wish he was a post player first, and a jump shooter second. But as long as hes playing like this, ill take it.
Is it to much to ask for a team that plays hard and cares? Seems so.
Skyhawk1
Starter
Posts: 2,106
And1: 102
Joined: Oct 06, 2005
Location: Atlanta

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#5 » by Skyhawk1 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:09 pm

I'm ok with him at the 3. Marvin sucks. I'd like us to go with a true capable C, not J Collins. This team could look really good inside that way.
GO HAWKS.
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#6 » by parson » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:35 pm

As much as I prefer Smoove's defense at PF, I guess the question is, "Who is our best SF?" If it's Smoove - especially since Horford's our best PF - then you have to play Smoove at the 3.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#7 » by evildallas » Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:45 pm

I think it is a brilliant development that I didn't expect to happen this soon. If he can maintain his new found shooting performance then I don't see a downside. If we are playing a big lineup then I see Josh actually posting from the small forward position where he would most likely have a size advantage. It does cost us in terms of help defense, but I think it greatly improves are on ball defense by matching things up better physically.

With Joe out we've had a chance to see how we can compete with Josh and Al as the Forwards and a platoon of lesser centers. Now imagine Joe in the lineup (if he doesn't stop the ball on offense) instead of Marvin at the 2. It gives hope that we could perhaps draft or acquire and even better big to add to the center rotation that we could be truly competitive for the next several years.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
User avatar
CALPURNIA
Sophomore
Posts: 162
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 03, 2007

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#8 » by CALPURNIA » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:12 pm

JSmoove is still a player to be defined. If his shoot is falling, his ball handling and passing ability make him a good 3. For sure better than our current starting one. He still can play the 4 when the coach thinks a smaller line up fits better.
With a 4 and a 5 that can shoot from midrange, Jsmoove is a great asset at the three.
When playing Jamaal-JJ-JSmoove-Horford-Powell (Collins, Zaza) we are probably the tallest, more athletic team in the league, with range, defense, post game... almost everything to hurt opponents...
The greatest thrill is not in killing, but in letting live.
- John Oliver Kerwood-
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#9 » by Ruhiel » Fri May 6, 2011 1:12 am

both Marvin Williams and Josh do not need to start.
Put one or the other in at SF with two rebounders. Defend and run. We got a new player in Teague lets not ruin it and make the game ASAP (as simple as possible).

& I don't understand where this he needs a jumper to be a 3. He takes a shot over shorter players the percentage should go up and his ability and willingness to get high percentage shots from post ups and hanging around the rim goes up.
He plays much like Gerald Wallace.
We get more cross matches from playing big. and Josh has shown a willingness to battle for inside position against Turkoglu.

When playing Teague-JJ-JSmoove-Horford-(Collins, Zaza, Powell) we are probably the biggest, most athletic team in the [playoffs], with range, defense, post game... almost everything to hurt opponents...

"Jason Collins may not benefit entirely from (mostly) playing alongside Al Horford and Josh Smith,

HOWEVER Josh Smith, as a defensive small forward, sure benefits from playing alongside Al Horford and Jason Collins."

http://network.yardbarker.com/nba/article_external/breaking_down_josh_smith_as_a_small_forward/4212776

Josh Smith w/ Horford & Collins
Poss OffEff DefEff Margin
512 109.2 97.9 +11.3

that's compared

The key for the playoffs is the team has to play together and flow into each other. 5 jump shooters with only Joe drawing doubles sporadically and Horford being the only rebounder is not consistent enough.
Turkoglu and Bass contesting shots with some bigs underneath it is not the same as Noah and Gibson contesting our "bigs". come on...
User avatar
geeman
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 3
Joined: May 27, 2005

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#10 » by geeman » Fri May 6, 2011 1:46 am

Yes, with Josh and Al at our forwards we need a Bill Lambeer type center
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#11 » by Geaux_Hawks » Fri May 6, 2011 4:27 pm

We need to hire Bill Laimbeer as the Head Coach, Sign Reggie Evans with the MLE and trade for Bargnani & Aaron Gray.Laimbeer will instill the Hawks with more physical play and toughness and probably teach Bargnani how to rebound better. No where near happening though.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#12 » by Geaux_Hawks » Fri May 6, 2011 4:27 pm

CALPURNIA wrote:JSmoove is still a player to be defined. If his shoot is falling, his ball handling and passing ability make him a good 3. For sure better than our current starting one. He still can play the 4 when the coach thinks a smaller line up fits better.
With a 4 and a 5 that can shoot from midrange, Jsmoove is a great asset at the three.
When playing Jamaal-JJ-JSmoove-Horford-Powell (Collins, Zaza) we are probably the tallest, more athletic team in the league, with range, defense, post game... almost everything to hurt opponents...


+1
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#13 » by Ruhiel » Fri May 6, 2011 4:43 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHl_FxokyS8[/youtube]
User avatar
Wont PerDont
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,712
And1: 355
Joined: Jun 06, 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
       

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#14 » by Wont PerDont » Sat May 7, 2011 6:47 pm

I'm a Bulls fan, but I assure you I come in peace...

What do you guys think about signing a guy like Tyson Chandler to play Center? Not sure what his contract situation is, but it would allow you to move Horford to the 4 full time and Smith to SF. Seems like it would really help w/rebounding (something that seems to be an issue in our current series) and w/Smith, Horford, and Chandler, you would automatically improve to be one of the best interior defenses in the entire league IMO. Not sure if Smith could guard smaller, quicker 3's full time, but he would be an equally tough mismatch in the post.

What do you think? That's a crazy long and athletic starting 5 and I would really like to see what would happen if Horford got to play PF full time.
Freaky like my lady pyramid...

-Formerly: gineric 12

-P.J. Carlesimo on Denver Coach Brian Shaw (2/21/14): "He's paid his dues and he's ready for a head job..."
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#15 » by Ruhiel » Sat May 7, 2011 8:07 pm

gineric 12 wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, but I assure you I come in peace...

What do you guys think about signing a guy like Tyson Chandler to play Center? Not sure what his contract situation is, but it would allow you to move Horford to the 4 full time and Smith to SF. Seems like it would really help w/rebounding (something that seems to be an issue in our current series) and w/Smith, Horford, and Chandler, you would automatically improve to be one of the best interior defenses in the entire league IMO. Not sure if Smith could guard smaller, quicker 3's full time, but he would be an equally tough mismatch in the post.

What do you think? That's a crazy long and athletic starting 5 and I would really like to see what would happen if Horford got to play PF full time.


YES
::
Chandler has recovered from that toe injury nicely with lots of hard work and has shown he can cover both an elite PF and an elite C against LA! He can ignite the fast break nicely for Horford and Smith with shot blocks and contests.

but NO
::::
Great asset to have but don't think Hawks can afford him or that he'd want to leave the stability of Dallas. Then there's the cap situation.
From a fan perspective I was counting on the Hawks rolling out the regular size lineup and keeping Noah and Gibson/Boozer off the boards to try to make the Bulls a one man show.
We beat the Magic on offensive rebounding and mixing lineups but unfortunately, Drew and his staff claim that the rebounding disparity is all about energy despite Joakim Noah outpacing Dwight Howard on the boards.
Beating the Bulls would be key to attract free agents. That would be a major step in showing this franchises commitment to winning. However, Hawks have yet to make any major adjustments.
I think their staying the course in game 4.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Revisiting Josh Smith as a small forward 

Post#16 » by Ruhiel » Sun May 8, 2011 3:37 pm

The Hawks kept the same lineup that the team used Tuesday night against Portland — guards Hinrich and Teague, forwards Joe Johnson and Josh Smith and center Al Horford. Johnson was asked the last time he played small forward. He replied: “Probably never.”
-March 16, 2011

Return to Atlanta Hawks