Rip2137 wrote:I give you guys the benefit of the doubt sometimes because..well...I don't know. I just do. But when a professional basketball analysis points out that A: Melo's threes were because of the Hawks not showing on picks and it stopped once they finally switched at the pick instead of trying to play it straight up and when they got out of the man zone defense and B: That the moving screen was the fault of the ball handler for going before the screener got set
and you STILL come in and blame Smith. Come on, that bull crap.
The backcourt was completely on Smith and it annoyed the hell out of me. But the nonsense in here blaming him for melo being "open" is ridiculous.
We lost the game but the foul calls on Horford were bigger than anything. He had it going (despite the bunch of turnovers) but the refs kept him out the game. Zaza is bringing nothing at this point, as his injury is really messing with him and there were some funky lineups at points in this game where there literally wasn't a scorer on the court.
Its a lost but its not as bad as you guys are making it seem.
I agree with alot of this but you can't fully blame Teague for the moving screen, it was partially his fault but Smith needs to abort on that screen when he sees that it won't work, a moving screen is a moving screen, Ik that it's in the heat of the moment but a "max player" wouldn't have tried to force it. The wide open 3s weren't his fault, they were the entire team's fault, noone rotated and there were far too many useless double teams that left many wide open shooters. (Not just Melo, Shumpert and Smith were open countless times) I also Agree that the refs were calling some bs fouls on Horford, especially that 4th one that took him out of the game for 6 minutes.