kg01 wrote:Heh, this is the equivalent of Col. Sturtz going into his bag. What's in his bag? A thesaurus.![]()
C'mon. That was funny.
Of course it was.
I don't know why, just being honest... but I'm sure it was.
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
kg01 wrote:Heh, this is the equivalent of Col. Sturtz going into his bag. What's in his bag? A thesaurus.![]()
C'mon. That was funny.
_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:Interested enough to click to open. Interested even to comment. Not interested enough to click to vote. Got it.
_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:kg01 wrote:That's "Capt. Willard" to you, Colonel.
I suppose I'm supposed to know what that means, but admittedly not only do I not, I don't even have interest to go look it up. But I'm sure I would have laughed.
REHawksFan wrote:_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:Interested enough to click to open. Interested even to comment. Not interested enough to click to vote. Got it.
You seem to have difficulty comprehending what I'm typing. Allow me to spell it out for ...I'm certainly interested in discussion or I wouldn't be here. I'm interested in Trae and even in whether he's considered a potentially elite or superstar player. I'm interested in those discussions. I'm not interested in playing your little games. I'm not sure how that's confusing to you. I tried to have a discussion by posting my thoughts on Trae's potential for being Top 5 in the MVP and you weren't interested. But you are certainly interested now that I stated why I wouldn't vote in your silly poll.
kg01 wrote:_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:kg01 wrote:That's "Capt. Willard" to you, Colonel.
I suppose I'm supposed to know what that means, but admittedly not only do I not, I don't even have interest to go look it up. But I'm sure I would have laughed.
Ya know, when you have to explain the joke, it removes all the fun ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_Now
.... but perhaps that was your plan all along, Colonel. Well played. Well played.
_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:REHawksFan wrote:_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:Interested enough to click to open. Interested even to comment. Not interested enough to click to vote. Got it.
You seem to have difficulty comprehending what I'm typing. Allow me to spell it out for ...I'm certainly interested in discussion or I wouldn't be here. I'm interested in Trae and even in whether he's considered a potentially elite or superstar player. I'm interested in those discussions. I'm not interested in playing your little games. I'm not sure how that's confusing to you. I tried to have a discussion by posting my thoughts on Trae's potential for being Top 5 in the MVP and you weren't interested. But you are certainly interested now that I stated why I wouldn't vote in your silly poll.
Not at all. Ironically enough, as you keep typing about my cognitive difficulties, the "games," and "silly" polls with such great disdain, it eludes you that you're reinforcing the suspicion. For your own sake, hopefully you never are actually guilty of a real-life crime... your denials have the unintended opposite effect.
_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:What's "on" you, my friend, is captured in the words, "Me thinks he doth protest too much."
I didn't approach you, didn't single you out, didn't make the claim about anyone else for that matter that any individual who frequents this board that their decision to not vote made a statement.
When 50 visit a thread under a heading that explicitly makes known what it's about, and 47 of those decide not to vote, we don't know *precisely who* it makes a statement about, but it makes a general statement. What statement is debatable, but that it makes a statement is undeniable.
Seems you intensely don't want it to make a certain statement, or you wouldn't have bothered to come back to the thread to argue about it. Hence those seven words Billy Shakespeare made famous.