MaceCase wrote:Yes, the natural logical progression from "we can re-sign Bazemore" is "we can sign Durant too" "lol".
No you don't get the cap otherwise you wouldn't have made that terrible mistake with DeMarre's free agency in the first place.
You can assume that Horford and Bazemore are returned but that doesn't mean that the rest of the roster is the same, that is a leap that you made. And while making that assumption you are somehow trying to assert that what? The only type of significant move that the Hawks should make is if they sign another max free agent? Well that is entirely your opinion that has little to do with the success last season, the success THIS season, or the success for seasons to come.
I can see that you're in your feelings already once the "lols" start to drop so I'll bow out before the cavalry jumps in to coddle you.
haha no you are what i call a keyboard commando. So you cant have any type of discussion because you have to be a nerd and obsessed with the decimal point and attack people to make them feel small so you can feel better about how all knowing you are.
its cool man ive dealt with people like that before, doesnt bother me.
You missed my point the whole time. you became obsessed with me mentioning 71 million and completely didnt see anything else.
OF COURSE they coudlnt sign both, I KNOW THAT, we debated it on this board for weeks. My point was if they wouldnt choose to pay DMC 15 million, what makes you think they will pay Bazemore the same OR MORE AND have to sign AH and go into the luxury tax . Yes they had to choose, because they couldnt sign both due to the short deal of DMC. I GET ALL THAT, i said that like 25 times.
So , i said FORGET it. Just answer me a simple question that i asked in the post before. But you wont, youll just tell me "im all in the feels" and that you are just too sophisticated to argue with us creatons (is that even how you spell it? I dont know, im dumb)
godspeed Genius.
