Jamaaliver wrote:There’s one more aspect of the Bogdan Bogdan signing we seem to keep overlooking:
Ressler and Travis just royally screwed over Budenholzer in his quest for a title.
Now.............
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
Jamaaliver wrote:There’s one more aspect of the Bogdan Bogdan signing we seem to keep overlooking:
Ressler and Travis just royally screwed over Budenholzer in his quest for a title.
City of Trees wrote:Hey there is the flexibility I was talking about.
Congrats Hawks fans! Bogi is fun to watch!



My take is he's not a stopper or even someone I'd call a good defender. If the plan is to play him at SG he has good size and a deceptively long wingspan but the lateral quickness is average. High IQ player so team defensive concepts and rotations shouldn't be a problem. Effort is never an issues._s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:City of Trees wrote:Hey there is the flexibility I was talking about.
Congrats Hawks fans! Bogi is fun to watch!
Another question if I may.
Am I just doing the rainbows and unicorns thing, and otherwise confirmation bias, when I watch him play defense and see him, actually, seem to be more of a legitimate defender and more of a factor than the defensive numbers suggest?

tbhawksfan1 wrote:Wow. So much talent and depth... seems so all the sudden
City of Trees wrote:My take is he's not a stopper or even someone I'd call a good defender. If the plan is to play him at SG he has good size and a deceptively long wingspan but the lateral quickness is average. High IQ player so team defensive concepts and rotations shouldn't be a problem. Effort is never an issues._s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:City of Trees wrote:Hey there is the flexibility I was talking about.
Congrats Hawks fans! Bogi is fun to watch!
Another question if I may.
Am I just doing the rainbows and unicorns thing, and otherwise confirmation bias, when I watch him play defense and see him, actually, seem to be more of a legitimate defender and more of a factor than the defensive numbers suggest?
Bob8 wrote:Bogdan is great signing, Gallinari is bad. I believe Hawks might have chosen differently, if they have signed Bogdan first.
Bob8 wrote:Bogdan is great signing, Gallinari is bad. I believe Hawks might have chosen differently, if they have signed Bogdan first.
High 5 wrote:Bob8 wrote:Bogdan is great signing, Gallinari is bad. I believe Hawks might have chosen differently, if they have signed Bogdan first.
Sorry we took Gallinari from you, buddy. Better luck next time.