thr3ep01nte4 wrote:So he’s a liability. That doesn’t sound like a recipe for success when your only big man on the floor can be constantly exposed on defense in the playoffs.
Is Wendall Carter a defensive liability? I'm not willing to go that far.
He's not Kevin Love bad. Or even Dwight Howard bad.
But he isn't quite Clint Capela or Al Horford, either.
All of these kids have some flaw. WC's is that he can't jump out of the gym and
struggles to defend quick guards on the perimeter.
Same flaw that John Collins had. (has?)Overall, Wendell's a better defender than Bagley or Ayton. And a more consistent offensive threat than Bamba or JJJ.
Add'l NOTE: Defensively, I think Dedmon is a decent comp for Wendell: Good rebounder, capable shot blocker. Adequate defending on the perimeter.
Code: Select all
Wendell Carter has a substantial case as Duke’s best player this season. Scouts view his game as extremely well-rounded, and he appears likely to crack the lottery given the way he’s produced. Carter leads the team’s regulars in field goal percentage, true shooting percentage, defensive rebound percentage and blocks per game, coming on strong in conference play and showing the diversity of his skill set. There really aren’t many holes in his game, and he’s been a central figure in Duke’s success.
Carter is often critiqued for a perceived lack of elite athleticism, but it pertains more to his quickness off the floor, as Carter moves his feet pretty well and has stepped up defensively in recent weeks as Duke’s chief rim protector. Carter has improved his body and stands a legitimate 6’10” with a 7’3” reported wingspan, adequate for a center. SI.com