macd-gm wrote:I'm not sure i followed your point there but I disagree with some of that. In what world is IT better than Kyrie? Not in this flat world.
Kyrie's scoring and overall shooting percentage are well over what he did in Cleveland. Everything he is doing screams career year for a guy who was already an all star. And LOTS of people thought Lebron was the reason he looked like a superstar in Cleveland.
All this talk about how the Celtics aren't good when Horford is off the court is stupid. The Celtics aren't good when friggin Aron Baynes is on the court. Pretty simple really. They said the same thing in Atlanta. When you're backup is Gustavo Ayon or Baynes then yes your on/off court comparison looks really great.
Mac, stop
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=Kyrie+Irving&player_id1_select=Kyrie+Irving&y1=2018&player_id1=irvinky01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Isaiah+Thomas&player_id2_select=Isaiah+Thomas&y2=2017&player_id2=thomais02&idx=players
IT had a better year last year than what Kyrie is having this year. And no, Kyrie is not "well" over what he was in Cleveland. He's seen some gains in some areas and some loses in others. This is the point I'm making, you can't replace IT with less individual production then say that that is the catalyst of increased team success. There has to be something going on elsewhere. It's not just with Al but although I've certainly derided his character I've certainly always recognized him as the ultimate glue guy.

















