ImageImage

Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#181 » by Whole Truth » Mon Jun 3, 2024 10:54 pm

dms269 wrote:I really think Atlanta is hesitant to give up #1 in that type of deal. BY doing it you are saying you will max Ingram (huge mistake) and that Herb is worth #1+another first (difference in Murray to Ingram), which I am not sure of. Yes Herb is an amazing defender, but his offense and the rest of his game still needs some work (bad rebounder). Typically with higher usage comes lower %s.


The deal is not mine. Some NO's reporter that supposedly has a Hawk link, stated that trade came from the Hawks side, then he deleted his account later in the evening after it spread.

It's fair to be weary of BI's contract but that is why Hunter is coming back. NO's are taking back 50m in salary but BI has not been extended yet, he's only 30m currently. Which would suggest Hunter is moving in this deal, so Atlanta can extend BI. Murray 30m/4yrs, Hunter 20m/4yrs = potential 50m extension. So BI's value is not as a rental. Which arguably puts him on par with Murray's value outside of contract value, which Herb's value 12m contract balances out to an equivalent financial trade off. 60m for 60m

Herb is a lot better than people know. I absolutely hate the idea of having to give him up as every other NO's fan does. Same with Hawks fans not wanting to part with the #1 pick. There's some NO's fans now upset & arguing at the idea of trading Herb for the #1 pick in this draft.

Whether additional pick value is required IDK either & could be argued but I think BI & Herb take Atlanta to a different level more than Sarr's potential would. Especially in the near future with Young wanting to contend.

As you point to the risk of BI's extension, which there is. There's also risk of losing the value of the #1 pick if you miss on the selection in an uncertain draft not having draft rights for the next 3yrs.

There's a lot to unpack. Risk/Reward.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,871
And1: 17,414
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#182 » by Jamaaliver » Mon Jun 3, 2024 11:46 pm

Whole Truth wrote:Herb is a lot better than people know.


No one is building a huge trade package around a 12 ppg scorer.
NDaATL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 625
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
 

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#183 » by NDaATL » Mon Jun 3, 2024 11:58 pm

Whole Truth wrote:
dms269 wrote:I really think Atlanta is hesitant to give up #1 in that type of deal. BY doing it you are saying you will max Ingram (huge mistake) and that Herb is worth #1+another first (difference in Murray to Ingram), which I am not sure of. Yes Herb is an amazing defender, but his offense and the rest of his game still needs some work (bad rebounder). Typically with higher usage comes lower %s.


The deal is not mine. Some NO's reporter that supposedly has a Hawk link, stated that trade came from the Hawks side, then he deleted his account later in the evening after it spread.

It's fair to be weary of BI's contract but that is why Hunter is coming back. NO's are taking back 50m in salary but BI has not been extended yet, he's only 30m currently. Which would suggest Hunter is moving in this deal, so Atlanta can extend BI. Murray 30m/4yrs, Hunter 20m/4yrs = potential 50m extension. So BI's value is not as a rental. Which arguably puts him on par with Murray's value outside of contract value, which Herb's value 12m contract balances out to an equivalent financial trade off. 60m for 60m

Herb is a lot better than people know. I absolutely hate the idea of having to give him up as every other NO's fan does. Same with Hawks fans not wanting to part with the #1 pick. There's some NO's fans now upset & arguing at the idea of trading Herb for the #1 pick in this draft.

Whether additional pick value is required IDK either & could be argued but I think BI & Herb take Atlanta to a different level more than Sarr's potential would. Especially in the near future with Young wanting to contend.

As you point to the risk of BI's extension, which there is. There's also risk of losing the value of the #1 pick if you miss on the selection in an uncertain draft not having draft rights for the next 3yrs.

There's a lot to unpack. Risk/Reward.

Herb is a great piece no doubt, but he's like the 4th-5th best player on a championship team. That isn't worth the #1 overall pick, ever. We could potentially be giving up a superstar at #1 for a defensive role player. Talk about risk/reward, you don't do that. We already gave up Luka. We also traded the #3 overall pick in the past (Pau Gasol) for Shareef Abdur Raheem b/c he was a "sure thing". That is absolutely backbreaking if Sarr or whomever goes #1 becomes a star. If Sarr busts and Trae leaves in 2 years so be it, he's a great player but it's not like he is prime LeBron or Shaq. Adding Jones/Ingram at 50 million doesn't make the Hawks a contender.

Plus we would trade Trae for assets before letting him walk for nothing.

Murray at 30M per is WORLDS better than Ingram at 50M per. The contract is such a massive difference. If they were on equal contracts they would have similar value. But they don't. And, Ingram misses a lot of games. He hasn't played over 64 games since 2016. He misses like 25+ games a year. Murray is much more reliable.

Hunter is a solid player. His contract isn't that bad for his production. He's making low 20s per year, it's not crippling. He's a good scorer and a solid man defender, good 3pt shooter, with great size. We don't need to trade the #1 overall pick and the chance to draft a potential star + Murray to unload his contract. He will be a serviceable player for the next 3 years, easily.

It's just a bad trade for the Hawks and I love Jones.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#184 » by Whole Truth » Tue Jun 4, 2024 12:05 am

Jamaaliver wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:Herb is a lot better than people know.


No one is building a huge trade package around a 12 ppg scorer.


An extended BI is headlining the trade but Hawks fans will find out quickly Herb is the best player & value in this trade, including BI. His defense, versatility & spacing will best Murray's fit & it won't be close.

Non will take my word & his numbers won't back it up but you'd find out real quick how true it is.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#185 » by Whole Truth » Tue Jun 4, 2024 12:10 am

NDaATL wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:
dms269 wrote:I really think Atlanta is hesitant to give up #1 in that type of deal. BY doing it you are saying you will max Ingram (huge mistake) and that Herb is worth #1+another first (difference in Murray to Ingram), which I am not sure of. Yes Herb is an amazing defender, but his offense and the rest of his game still needs some work (bad rebounder). Typically with higher usage comes lower %s.


The deal is not mine. Some NO's reporter that supposedly has a Hawk link, stated that trade came from the Hawks side, then he deleted his account later in the evening after it spread.

It's fair to be weary of BI's contract but that is why Hunter is coming back. NO's are taking back 50m in salary but BI has not been extended yet, he's only 30m currently. Which would suggest Hunter is moving in this deal, so Atlanta can extend BI. Murray 30m/4yrs, Hunter 20m/4yrs = potential 50m extension. So BI's value is not as a rental. Which arguably puts him on par with Murray's value outside of contract value, which Herb's value 12m contract balances out to an equivalent financial trade off. 60m for 60m

Herb is a lot better than people know. I absolutely hate the idea of having to give him up as every other NO's fan does. Same with Hawks fans not wanting to part with the #1 pick. There's some NO's fans now upset & arguing at the idea of trading Herb for the #1 pick in this draft.

Whether additional pick value is required IDK either & could be argued but I think BI & Herb take Atlanta to a different level more than Sarr's potential would. Especially in the near future with Young wanting to contend.

As you point to the risk of BI's extension, which there is. There's also risk of losing the value of the #1 pick if you miss on the selection in an uncertain draft not having draft rights for the next 3yrs.

There's a lot to unpack. Risk/Reward.

Herb is a great piece no doubt, but he's like the 4th-5th best player on a championship team. That isn't worth the #1 overall pick, ever. We could potentially be giving up a superstar at #1 for a defensive role player. Talk about risk/reward, you don't do that. We already gave up Luka. We also traded the #3 overall pick in the past (Pau Gasol) for Shareef Abdur Raheem b/c he was a "sure thing". That is absolutely backbreaking if Sarr or whomever goes #1 becomes a star. If Sarr busts and Trae leaves in 2 years so be it, he's a great player but it's not like he is prime LeBron or Shaq. Adding Jones/Ingram at 50 million doesn't make the Hawks a contender.

Plus we would trade Trae for assets before letting him walk for nothing.

Murray at 30M per is WORLDS better than Ingram at 50M per. The contract is such a massive difference. If they were on equal contracts they would have similar value. But they don't. And, Ingram misses a lot of games. He hasn't played over 64 games since 2016. He misses like 25+ games a year. Murray is much more reliable.

Hunter is a solid player. His contract isn't that bad for his production. He's making low 20s per year, it's not crippling. He's a good scorer and a solid man defender, good 3pt shooter, with great size. We don't need to trade the #1 overall pick and the chance to draft a potential star + Murray to unload his contract. He will be a serviceable player for the next 3 years, easily.

It's just a bad trade for the Hawks and I love Jones.


Fair that you don't like the trade. I'm not here to force an opinion but I'm telling you after laughing at the idea. NO's fans wouldn't trade Herb for Murray straight up.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,155
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#186 » by Geaux_Hawks » Tue Jun 4, 2024 12:29 am

Whole Truth wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:Herb is a lot better than people know.


No one is building a huge trade package around a 12 ppg scorer.


An extended BI is headlining the trade but Hawks fans will find out quickly Herb is the best player & value in this trade, including BI. His defense, versatility & spacing will best Murray's fit & it won't be close.

Non will take my word & his numbers won't back it up but you'd find out real quick how true it is.


I don't think anyone is questioning Herb Jones and his defensive impact. The hiccup is BI's potential max contract. Herb Jones doesn't do enough in other areas of the court to suggest it's worth maxing BI so we could have Herb as well. Herb is just the definition of a 3&D wing. His game is absolutely 1:1 when it comes to being that. He's the kind of player the Hawks would value in a starting lineup with Trae.

Now if you told me BI would settle much closer to $35M AAV, then it might be a much more palatable deal to consider. I'd still look to hold onto the #1 pick, but you'd have me strongly considering including it in a deal. BI at $50M/year just ain't it.
NDaATL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 625
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
 

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#187 » by NDaATL » Tue Jun 4, 2024 1:48 am

Geaux_Hawks wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:
No one is building a huge trade package around a 12 ppg scorer.


An extended BI is headlining the trade but Hawks fans will find out quickly Herb is the best player & value in this trade, including BI. His defense, versatility & spacing will best Murray's fit & it won't be close.

Non will take my word & his numbers won't back it up but you'd find out real quick how true it is.


I don't think anyone is questioning Herb Jones and his defensive impact. The hiccup is BI's potential max contract. Herb Jones doesn't do enough in other areas of the court to suggest it's worth maxing BI so we could have Herb as well. Herb is just the definition of a 3&D wing. His game is absolutely 1:1 when it comes to being that. He's the kind of player the Hawks would value in a starting lineup with Trae.

Now if you told me BI would settle much closer to $35M AAV, then it might be a much more palatable deal to consider. I'd still look to hold onto the #1 pick, but you'd have me strongly considering including it in a deal. BI at $50M/year just ain't it.

You don't trade the #1 overall pick in any year for a role player who averages 12ppg. Unless we think we are one role player away from a championship. Hawks didn't even make the playoffs this year, why would we dump a #1 overall for a role player?

Ingram makes the deal way worse for us. 50m a year is a negative value contract. We would have to give away picks and assets to unload it. It would be like a Beal level contract. I'd rather just let him walk than pay him 50m.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,155
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#188 » by Geaux_Hawks » Tue Jun 4, 2024 2:16 am

NDaATL wrote:
Geaux_Hawks wrote:
The hiccup is BI's potential max contract.

Now if you told me BI would settle much closer to $35M AAV, then it might be a much more palatable deal to consider. I'd still look to hold onto the #1 pick, but you'd have me strongly considering including it in a deal. BI at $50M/year just ain't it.

You don't trade the #1 overall pick in any year for a role player who averages 12ppg. Unless we think we are one role player away from a championship. Hawks didn't even make the playoffs this year, why would we dump a #1 overall for a role player?

Ingram makes the deal way worse for us. 50m a year is a negative value contract. We would have to give away picks and assets to unload it. It would be like a Beal level contract. I'd rather just let him walk than pay him 50m.


Don't think I was ever really saying we should be moving the #1 pick for Herb. I was saying BI at $35M with Herb Jones, would at least be worth discussing if we're also dumping Hunter. My post states I would still hold onto #1 though and that BI's potential max contract is a hiccup.
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,448
And1: 1,578
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#189 » by CP War Hawks » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:18 am

So is this the concoction of a NO media source from the earlier report of NOP looking into Murray, Garland, etc.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#190 » by Whole Truth » Tue Jun 4, 2024 11:04 am

Geaux_Hawks wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:
No one is building a huge trade package around a 12 ppg scorer.


An extended BI is headlining the trade but Hawks fans will find out quickly Herb is the best player & value in this trade, including BI. His defense, versatility & spacing will best Murray's fit & it won't be close.

Non will take my word & his numbers won't back it up but you'd find out real quick how true it is.


I don't think anyone is questioning Herb Jones and his defensive impact. The hiccup is BI's potential max contract. Herb Jones doesn't do enough in other areas of the court to suggest it's worth maxing BI so we could have Herb as well. Herb is just the definition of a 3&D wing. His game is absolutely 1:1 when it comes to being that. He's the kind of player the Hawks would value in a starting lineup with Trae.

Now if you told me BI would settle much closer to $35M AAV, then it might be a much more palatable deal to consider. I'd still look to hold onto the #1 pick, but you'd have me strongly considering including it in a deal. BI at $50M/year just ain't it.


Herb's IQ & feel for the game is exceptional. He does all the little things that contributes to winning. the ultimate 3D glue player that every Championship team needs. He's a 12 ppg player, simply because he played with 4 players that can put up 20-30pts on any given night in Jonas, Zion, BI, CJ. No other reason, he's capable of more. Those 12 points came on 7 APG, 14% usage. A couple driving layups, a few corner 3's. Herb was actually a more consistent & reliable threat from 3 than Murphy this past season as you know with percentages some players are hot & cold. Murray averaged his 22 points on 18 APG & a 25% usage rate to a team & Young's detriment. Murray's usage rate, lowered Youngs usage from 35% to 30. His lowest, since his rookie year.

Herb is more than capable of putting up more points if you need him to & he will do it efficiently as he's not a ball hog or shot happy player. These are traits I value over raw points on high usage & attempts. Especially if you have a star that's best in higher usage.

Lets talk about Murray's usage, fit & why the move didn't pan out. Defensive versatility, outside the PG position Murray losses his defensive value. 25% usage rate & 18 APG, led to Youngs lowest usage rate since his rookie season where Hawks fans talk about Young by himself carrying the team to a top 10 offense with no secondary star... That's because without a second star, Young was averaging closer to 35% usage than 30, where his offensive production has to out weight his defense for him to be an impactful player.

Herbs trade value. Here's the underlying fact of this trade & 12ppg player. Hawks paid 3 draft picks + for Murray's offense & defense to compliment Young & it failed for the reasons I stated above. Where Herb's defense & defensive versatility had 4 offensive starters in NO's top 6 in defensive rating. Herb would single handedly carry the Hawks defense to respectability, while fitting seamless on that end with Young because of his versatility. Offensively, his low usage rate & meager 12ppg also allow Young to return to being on ball more, closer to his 35% usage rate. As I stated above, Herb plays within the offense & doesn't force. He's not a ball hog or shot happy player. All that to say, I know how you could have spent those draft picks much better, with far better results.

Isn't that the point of trading value, to get better. Herb by himself transforms your team for the better. He's not a player any NO's fans want to trade. As Hawks don't want to trade #1. Understandable that Hawks want to keep the potential/risk of the #1 but from NO's side, Herb's proven value is going nowhere without it.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#191 » by Whole Truth » Tue Jun 4, 2024 11:36 am

Not sure why you're fixated on the #1 pick for Herb when BI is in trade. It's combined value. Hunter is the salary dump in order to extend BI. Herb is the 3D contract value to offset BI's extension & Murray's value contract.

It's basically (BI, extension, Herb) for (Murray, salary dump, #1)

You may disagree but I don't value Murray over either BI or Herb. Wouldn't trade either one for Murray straight up, he's not the best offensive fit with ZIon, where NO's are hoping he will be a + defender again if moved to point. NO's are extending & starting Murphy so there's no need for Hunter other than to match salaries, which allows Hawks to extend BI without adding salary, as BI is currently at 30m & Hawks can leave Hunter out the trade, with no extension. Hunter is in trade for the purpose of extension & to not increase salary. I don't agree an unproven Sarr at 12m in this draft is worth considerably more than a proven Herb at 12m. I would probably argue different if I had the #1 pick & OKC was trying to offer up Dort, so I understand the other side of the coin. Maybe a FRP in a future draft needs to be added, IDK.

I will contend if the #1 pick does bust which in this draft is a higher potential for. NO's will have effectively traded BI, Herb & proven for Murray, chance & lost. Add a FRP depending on projection, I don't know if the unproven value risk is worth it at that point.
NDaATL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 625
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
 

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#192 » by NDaATL » Tue Jun 4, 2024 1:12 pm

Whole Truth wrote:Not sure why you're fixated on the #1 pick for Herb when BI is in trade. It's combined value. Hunter is the salary dump in order to extend BI. Herb is the 3D contract value to offset BI's extension & Murray's value contract.

It's basically (BI, extension, Herb) for (Murray, salary dump, #1)

You may disagree but I don't value Murray over either BI or Herb. Wouldn't trade either one for Murray straight up, he's not the best offensive fit with ZIon, where NO's are hoping he will be a + defender again if moved to point. NO's are extending & starting Murphy so there's no need for Hunter other than to match salaries, which allows Hawks to extend BI without adding salary, as BI is currently at 30m & Hawks can leave Hunter out the trade, with no extension. Hunter is in trade for the purpose of extension & to not increase salary. I don't agree an unproven Sarr at 12m in this draft is worth considerably more than a proven Herb at 12m. I would probably argue different if I had the #1 pick & OKC was trying to offer up Dort, so I understand the other side of the coin. Maybe a FRP in a future draft needs to be added, IDK.

I will contend if the #1 pick does bust which in this draft is a higher potential for. NO's will have effectively traded BI, Herb & proven for Murray, chance & lost. Add a FRP depending on projection, I don't know if the unproven value risk is worth it at that point.

Noone is talking about BI because he is negative value. 50m a year for Ingram is a Beal level, franchise crippling deal. We will be locked into mediocrity for the next 5 years. We probably become Chicago. And would have no picks to reload. Hunter isn't a bad player. The only real value there is Herb, but he's not worth giving up Murray + #1 overall. Murray straight up for Herb and fillers is a fair deal, you might could argue for the protected Sac 1st that we own. #1 overall is just out of the question.

Teams that didn't make the playoffs don't give up #1 overall for a role player, ever. You just don't do it, regardless of what you think of this draft.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#193 » by Whole Truth » Tue Jun 4, 2024 1:27 pm

NDaATL wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:Not sure why you're fixated on the #1 pick for Herb when BI is in trade. It's combined value. Hunter is the salary dump in order to extend BI. Herb is the 3D contract value to offset BI's extension & Murray's value contract.

It's basically (BI, extension, Herb) for (Murray, salary dump, #1)

You may disagree but I don't value Murray over either BI or Herb. Wouldn't trade either one for Murray straight up, he's not the best offensive fit with ZIon, where NO's are hoping he will be a + defender again if moved to point. NO's are extending & starting Murphy so there's no need for Hunter other than to match salaries, which allows Hawks to extend BI without adding salary, as BI is currently at 30m & Hawks can leave Hunter out the trade, with no extension. Hunter is in trade for the purpose of extension & to not increase salary. I don't agree an unproven Sarr at 12m in this draft is worth considerably more than a proven Herb at 12m. I would probably argue different if I had the #1 pick & OKC was trying to offer up Dort, so I understand the other side of the coin. Maybe a FRP in a future draft needs to be added, IDK.

I will contend if the #1 pick does bust which in this draft is a higher potential for. NO's will have effectively traded BI, Herb & proven for Murray, chance & lost. Add a FRP depending on projection, I don't know if the unproven value risk is worth it at that point.

Noone is talking about BI because he is negative value. 50m a year for Ingram is a Beal level, franchise crippling deal. We will be locked into mediocrity for the next 5 years. We probably become Chicago. And would have no picks to reload. Hunter isn't a bad player. The only real value there is Herb, but he's not worth giving up Murray + #1 overall. Murray straight up for Herb and fillers is a fair deal, you might could argue for the protected Sac 1st that we own. #1 overall is just out of the question.

Teams that didn't make the playoffs don't give up #1 overall for a role player, ever. You just don't do it, regardless of what you think of this draft.


Your issue is with BI's production value. I was not watching it as though Herb was giving BI player value but rather contract value.

The point of having no picks if BI extension doesn't pan out, is not much different than having no picks if you miss on the #1 pick either. The main difference is proven value now to contend vs potential value & patience with Young wanting to contend & having limited control left. Hunter & Murray's 50m/4yrs is going out for that extension. Murray hasn't fit in well & Hunter has some risk to his contract but if you don't view BI as a good player/fit then this is where the trade falls apart ...

Anyway I thought we were disputing over the added value of Herb not BI as the center piece.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,761
And1: 1,741
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#194 » by dms269 » Tue Jun 4, 2024 1:40 pm

I think the topic of a BI+Herb for Murray, Hunter, #1 has gotten this thread off topic enough. If the conversation about it needs to continue please bring it up on the trade/transactions board. Neither side is going to change their viewpoint.
-dms269


Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,871
And1: 17,414
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#195 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Jun 4, 2024 2:42 pm

I am not onboard with us wasting risking a top pick on Zacc Risacher.

If we trade back from #1...I'd be more onboard taking a swing with Topic. I figure that one of Trae or Dejounte is leaving anyway and he could end up being a real gem of a pick if this injury sends him falling out of the top-5.
Spoiler:
Read on Twitter
Read on Twitter
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,660
And1: 13,127
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#196 » by jayu70 » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:17 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:I am not onboard with us wasting risking a top pick on Zacc Risacher.

If we trade back from #1...I'd be more onboard taking a swing with Topic. I figure that one of Trae or Dejounte is leaving anyway and he could end up being a real gem of a pick if this injury sends him falling out of the top-5.
Spoiler:
Read on Twitter
Read on Twitter

Drafting another injured guy we don't get to see in SL :(
tbhawksfan1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,305
And1: 2,674
Joined: May 23, 2015

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#197 » by tbhawksfan1 » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:27 pm

Name the last 7'1" draftee that had Sarr's handles / D / passing / shooting / quickness

He will get stronger. Look at his legs. He has a much better base than Wemby or Chet

Read on Twitter
?
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,871
And1: 17,414
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#198 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:31 pm

jayu70 wrote:Drafting another injured guy we don't get to see in SL :(



The recent recurring injuries are a concern. Him missing 2024 Summer League would be a real bummer...but Jayu. The dude is an elite passer. We're talking Trae level passing from a 6'7" EURO PG.

He can't shoot off the dribble yet. But he shoots 88% from the FT line and is decent as a catch and shoot guy. His off ball movement is solid (already better than Trae) and he has the makings of an above average defender.

He has a chance to end up the best player from this draft class. If we could trade back and get this guy...that'd be a coup.

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
tbhawksfan1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,305
And1: 2,674
Joined: May 23, 2015

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#199 » by tbhawksfan1 » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:45 pm

People got spoild with Wemby / Chet / Paolo and are labeling this a weak draft. I think it's a very good draft, just no one as good as aforementioned
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,871
And1: 17,414
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Atlanta Hawks win #1 Pick in 2024 Draft Lottery 

Post#200 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:52 pm

tbhawksfan1 wrote:People got spoild with Wemby / Chet / Paolo and are labeling this a weak draft. I think it's a very good draft, just no one as good as aforementioned


I've tried to judge the top players in where'd they go in the 2018/2019/2022 draft cycles.

Sarr might go top-5 in each of those years. He wouldn't sniff #1.

No one else in this draft class comes close IMO. I think that's why it's considered weak.

(Topic and Castle each have an argument to be top-10 in that loaded 2018 draft class.)

Return to Atlanta Hawks