ImageImage

Horford won't sign a Contract Extension before next summer

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#41 » by PandaKidd » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:25 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
PandaKidd wrote:I bet if you tested the trade market on AH right now, its EXTREMELY soft. Youll get back a bunch of 2nd rounders and future worthless picks we will screw up anyway :P


Wow.

I think that's the disconnect then. I see Horford as a top 20 player in his prime.

His only concern moving forward are injury concerns.

I'm thinking he's easily worth lottery picks and young talent.

All Star-All NBA-best jump shooting (space creating) big man in the NBA.

Wow. I didn't realize we viewed AH as having such little value in the league.

This...genuinely astounds me. How can we justify offering $25 million when the market for him is so soft?


Dude, HONESTLY, when is the last time a team traded a TOP 20 PLAYER in his prime and got back EQUAL or BETTER value? I cant think of 1.

Its not about Horfords value, its about teams NOT giving up assets for a 1 year rental. Thats why the big trades just dont happen anymore. Why would a team give up THEIR Top talent to get OUR talent, when they could just wait until next year and SIGN HIM OUTRIGHT?

Not only that, the cap is going to give teams TONS of money to spend next year, theres literally NO incentive to get trade for ANYONE. If NYK tried to trade Melo right now, what do you think they get back? Kevin Durant? Derrick Rose? NO way man, they get back someones lottery protected pick and a bunch of players that are overpaid. They get back Gerald Wallace lol
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#42 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:37 pm

PandaKidd wrote:Dude, HONESTLY, when is the last time a team traded a TOP 20 PLAYER in his prime and got back EQUAL or BETTER value? I cant think of 1.

Its not about Horfords value, its about teams NOT giving up assets for a 1 year rental. Thats why the big trades just dont happen anymore. Why would a team give up THEIR Top talent to get OUR talent, when they could just wait until next year and SIGN HIM OUTRIGHT?


A very good point.

Utah getting a King's ransom (Derrick Favors + picks) for Deron Williams when he was still good.
ORL got Vucevic for getting rid of Dwight.
DEN gutted New York's roster in the Carmelo trade.
LAL moved an old, overweight Shaq for Lamar Odom, Caron Butler

Maybe Iverson for Chauncey Billups. (admittedly, AI was on the decline by then).



PandaKidd wrote:Not only that, the cap is going to give teams TONS of money to spend next year...


This is what worries me so much next season. The primary reason a contender might attempt to trade for Horford is for the right to overpay him with Bird rights. But yeah, I get what you mean.

I still can't fathom a world where Kevin Love gets the 2nd coming of Scottie Pippen...but Horford can't garner any interest.

That boggles my mind.
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#43 » by PandaKidd » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:40 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
PandaKidd wrote:Dude, HONESTLY, when is the last time a team traded a TOP 20 PLAYER in his prime and got back EQUAL or BETTER value? I cant think of 1.

Its not about Horfords value, its about teams NOT giving up assets for a 1 year rental. Thats why the big trades just dont happen anymore. Why would a team give up THEIR Top talent to get OUR talent, when they could just wait until next year and SIGN HIM OUTRIGHT?


A very good point.

Utah getting a King's ransom (Derrick Favors + picks) for Deron Williams when he was still good.
ORL got Vucevic for getting rid of Dwight.
DEN gutted New York's roster in the Carmelo trade.
LAL moved an old, overweight Shaq for Lamar Odom, Caron Butler

Maybe Iverson for Chauncey Billups. (admittedly, AI was on the decline by then).

Ok, rephrase:

Under the current CBA?



PandaKidd wrote:Not only that, the cap is going to give teams TONS of money to spend next year...


This is what worries me so much next season. The primary reason a contender might attempt to trade for Horford is for the right to overpay him with Bird rights. But yeah, I get what you mean.

I still can't fathom a world where Kevin Love gets the 2nd coming of Scottie Pippen...but Horford can't garner any interest.

That boggles my mind.


All time BONEHEAD CLE move that Lebron did as GM. If Lebron isnt GM, that doesnt happen IMO. CLE will do whatever it takes to make him happy. Does pat Riley do that?>?
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#44 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:57 pm

PandaKidd wrote:All time BONEHEAD CLE move that Lebron did as GM. If Lebron isnt GM, that doesnt happen IMO. CLE will do whatever it takes to make him happy. Does pat Riley do that?>?


Agreed. And no way Riley makes that move.

But I guarantee he'd still get Love while giving up much less in return. That man...is a genius. (Though drafting Mike Beasley ahead of Russ Westbrook and Kevin Love will haunt him for the end of his days.)

I do get your point.

And, I stress again, I don't want to lose AL.

But I see his value as being much greater. (I'm thinking Giannis, Dermarr DeRozan + conditional picks, Chandler Parsons + picks)

PandaKidd wrote:Ok, rephrase:Under the current CBA?

Fair enough...though keep an eye on Durant in OKC this year.
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#45 » by PandaKidd » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:59 pm

No way OKC moves Durant, hes a once in a generational talent, they are LOADED now FINALLY. They should be the best team in the West IMO if Donovan is any good. I hated Scott Brooks, he got by on talent alone, did nothing else.

I see your point too, and I used to share it. But the more and more the trade deadlines come and the more and more nothing big really gets done the more and more I feel the teams rather HOLD and pay than trade for peanuts (most of the time). Very rarely does that big blockbuster deal happen
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Horford won 

Post#46 » by MaceCase » Wed Aug 26, 2015 3:55 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
MaceCase wrote:In the effort of preserving peace just say you are wrong and that there is absolutely nothing to argue. You were wrong before, you are wrong today and you will be wrong tomorrow. History and facts tend to be funny that way in the face of biased opinions.

Your agenda is evident in the manner in which you are attempting to deconstruct the entire existence of free agency without presenting even a modicum of context or facts...


:o

Oh...
dear...
God...

You're trying to start an argument...but no one is arguing with you.


Oh
Dear
God

If you want to have a private little discussion with Panda then I suggest you PM him then. Don't pollute the board with nonsense, get defensive when I actually address the content only to then attempt to consider the exact points I already made when someone else repeats them. Maybe you're just soft or shell shocked from the constant shellackings you've taken in the past but if you find yourself unable to address a message just because it comes from a particular poster then I suggest the block option also. Until then, be wary of the resident fact checker who will work tirelessly day and night to ensure that this small corner of the internet is not filled with ignorance or lies :reporter:

Here's a cat gif. to save you from the impending catatonia the previous words will cause you.

Image
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#47 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:38 pm

MaceCase wrote:Image


That...
is...
adorable.

Thanks for contributing to the thread.

:cuddle

^
You and me.

(NOTE: The thought of you studying, obsessively, endlessly, incessantly over all of my posts and writings pleases me more than you can imagine. You're like one of my apostles!!! If you need my home e-mail for further correspondence...let me know. In the future...make sure you do ALL your homework, though.)
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#48 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:15 pm

PandaKidd wrote:No way OKC moves Durant, hes a once in a generational talent, they are LOADED now FINALLY. They should be the best team in the West IMO if Donovan is any good. I hated Scott Brooks, he got by on talent alone, did nothing else.

I see your point too, and I used to share it. But the more and more the trade deadlines come and the more and more nothing big really gets done the more and more I feel the teams rather HOLD and pay than trade for peanuts (most of the time). Very rarely does that big blockbuster deal happen


I agree that OKC shouldn't move Durant. But I wouldn't be surprised if, once they feel they have no shot at re-signing him, allow other teams to place bids for him.

If Westbrook puts up MVP-type numbers over the course of the season again...if KD continues struggling with injury...it might not be too insane that they swap out one star for another.

Durant for Carmelo makes way too much sense for all parties involved.

Add'l question:

If Tiago stays healthy and proves a perfect fit because of his defense and rebounding (as well as a suitable mentor for Edy), you think there's any chance Millsap gets traded in the next two years so that AL and Splitter can finally be our starting front court?

Teague and Millsap in trade could turn a middling team into a true contender...
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#49 » by PandaKidd » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:57 pm

I think not because I have a different viewpoint altogether. I dont see teams trading assets like that. Blockbuster trades RARELY happen.

Teams are built through drafting and free agency. Very RARELY do you see LEGIT TALENT A traded for LEGIT TALENT B.

Why would OKC trade Durant? Durant isnt going to tell them NO WAY NO HOW, hes going to be Lebron. Hes going to say "I love it here, I would lvoe to stay, ill let my agent handle this". Also, Durant KNOWS he has LOADED talent in OKC and OKC WILL PAY HIM. His question is does he want to go home and build a roster there.

Furthermore, why would the Knicks trade a guaranteed under contract superstar for Durant for half a year? Durant would have to wink wink nudge nudge agree to an extension which IIRC he cant really do. It would be a HUGE RISK for the Knicks.

The way salaries have to match, and other assets, I dont see trades like that happening, especially for SOLID role players like PM/Teague/AH.

Lets be honest here, AH is a great talent, but Im not sure the league looks at him as ELITE , same with PM and Teague
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Horford won 

Post#50 » by MaceCase » Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:18 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
(NOTE: The thought of you studying, obsessively, endlessly, incessantly over all of my posts and writings pleases me more than you can imagine. You're like one of my apostles!!! If you need my home e-mail for further correspondence...let me know. In the future...make sure you do ALL your homework, though.)

Don't flatter yourself there, chief, if there's anyone that is known to spend their nights searching far and wide for other people's posts.....it would be you.

Beyond that, the inanity of a lot of your posts throws off a pretty huge stink that's very hard to miss. I mean, case in point, that's the best you could do? A tweet based on speculation? Oh, how about the thought out and editorially published article by the exact same writer on the actual events that occurred with that trade:

Korver's $5 million contract becomes guaranteed for the 2012-13 season and slides into the Hawks' trade exception created when they dealt Joe Johnson to the Nets.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-16/sports/ct-spt-0717-bulls-nba-bits--20120717_1_gar-forman-trade-exception-omer-asik

No mention of a Hinrich sign and trade, huh? Must have been pulled out of his ass, something you're familiar with. At least you could argue Korver and Hinrich were possibly connected.....if Kirk didn't end up signing in Chicago almost 2 weeks after the trade occurred. C'est la Jamaal :wave: .
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#51 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Aug 26, 2015 11:23 pm

MaceCase wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:
(NOTE: The thought of you studying, obsessively, endlessly, incessantly over all of my posts and writings pleases me more than you can imagine. You're like one of my apostles!!! If you need my home e-mail for further correspondence...let me know. In the future...make sure you do ALL your homework, though.)

Don't flatter yourself there, chief, if there's anyone that is known to spend their nights searching far and wide for other people's posts.....it would be you.

Beyond that, the inanity of a lot of your posts throws off a pretty huge stink that's very hard to miss. I mean, case in point, that's the best you could do? A tweet based on speculation? Oh, how about the thought out and editorially published article by the exact same writer on the actual events that occurred with that trade:

Korver's $5 million contract becomes guaranteed for the 2012-13 season and slides into the Hawks' trade exception created when they dealt Joe Johnson to the Nets.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-16/sports/ct-spt-0717-bulls-nba-bits--20120717_1_gar-forman-trade-exception-omer-asik

No mention of a Hinrich sign and trade, huh? Must have been pulled out of his ass, something you're familiar with. At least you could argue Korver and Hinrich were possibly connected.....if Kirk didn't end up signing in Chicago almost 2 weeks after the trade occurred. C'est la Jamaal :wave: .


You are...on the right path. But...

The Bulls and Hawks had already worked out an agreement to send Korver to the Hawks. The specifics of the trade were worked out later after talks with Minnesota broke down on a three way trade.

But Korver...was destined for the Hawks in summer 2012. This was my point. CHI had multiple options to accomplish this and chose the trade exception route. But before that...they considered the Hinrich sign and trade also. Acquiring Korver was not solely contingent on a separate JJ trade.

NOTE: the Bulls ended up NOT using the trade exception and speculation throughout the CHI fanbase is that they regretted not doing the sign and trade instead, which would have allowed them to maintain their 'mini' midlevel exception to use elsewhere in 2012 Free Agency.

Also...you're dates might be a bit off. Hinrich had agreed in principle to return to Chicago within the first week of FA.

It took weeks to formalize the specifics of what funding they would use to acquire him: mainly MLE or sign & trade money.

This is a common tactic and one the Hawks used when agreeing to bring in Bazemore in Julybut 'officially' signing him weeks after the fact.


Hinrich played for the Hawks last season and could be included in the deal as part of a sign-and-trade agreement. Otherwise, he's committed to sign with the Bulls as an unrestricted free agent. If he first signs with the Hawks, the Bulls could retain their $3 million mini midlevel exception.
HERE

BUT THIS IS WHY I DON'T RESPOND TO YOUR BAITING. SOMEHOW A THREAD ABOUT HORFORD'S FREE AGENCY HAS TWISTED INTO A DEBATE ON THE SALARY CAP MINUTIAE OF A 2012 SALARY DUMP OF UNRELATED PLAYERS

And it's very unnecessary.

Seriously, man. Go home. Make love to your wife. Hang with the fam.

Save the anger and frustration for the Regular Season.

Be the bigger man, Mace. Let such a petty argument over the semantics of a hypothetical scenario go....

We'll have plenty of time for real arguments.
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Horford won 

Post#52 » by MaceCase » Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:25 am

Except that the Joe Johnson trade predated everything..........

In fact you would say that the trade precipitated the "destiny" of the Hawks looking to acquire a wing in the first place.

And given your stance on Horford (oh look how Mace makes everything always thread relevant), shouldn't the Hawks have been motivated to sign and trade the player that they just burned a rookie prospect and first round pick on rather than lose him for nothing?

They could have then used that $5 million TPE that they saved to acquire yet another player too.

Even at the end of the day of the actual trade, with Hawks potentially looking to get something for Hinrich and the Bulls potentially looking to save their tax-payer MLE they could have still sign and traded for Hinrich.. he would have fit nicely underneath that fine TPE that they happened to generate from trading Korver....

....yet they didn't.

Would appear to me that you are once again taking some speculation of something maybe possibly could happen....and mistaking it for something that was actually even considered. C'est la Jamaal.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#53 » by Jamaaliver » Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:16 pm

MaceCase wrote:Would appear to me that you are once again taking some speculation of something maybe possibly could happen....and mistaking it for something that was actually even considered. C'est la Jamaal.


1. I'm honestly not sure YOU even know what you're arguing about anymore.

2. I absolutely adore that your newest catchphrase is an homage to me. :nod:

The heart of this entire debate is this:

MaceCase wrote:No Joe trade no TPE, not TPE no Kyle.


And it's 100% INACCURATE.

CHI was looking to dump Korver and get NOTHING in return. And there were a number of ways to accomplish this.

But I do love the thought of Jamaaliver putting more consideration into potential trade scenarios than either Danny ferry or anyone in the Chicago Bulls front office. Cause if they weren't considering very basic ways to complete a necessary salary dump (trade Korver for a 2nd round pick, trade Korver for the draft rights to Cenk Aykol, trade Korver in a sign & trade for Kirk Hinrich) that means they're not very good at their jobs.

But when it comes to thinking outside the box

...that's Jamaal. :D

^I absolutely LOVE this!!!!

And I love you.
:argue:

:box:

:kiss

:cuddle
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Horford won 

Post#54 » by MaceCase » Fri Aug 28, 2015 7:13 am

Jamaaliver wrote:
CHI was looking to dump Korver and get NOTHING in return. And there were a number of ways to accomplish this.

But I do love the thought of Jamaaliver putting more consideration into potential trade scenarios than either Danny ferry or anyone in the Chicago Bulls front office. Cause if they weren't considering very basic ways to complete a necessary salary dump (trade Korver for a 2nd round pick, trade Korver for the draft rights to Cenk Aykol, trade Korver in a sign & trade for Kirk Hinrich) that means they're not very good at their jobs.

Hunny......sweetums.....snookums......

Chicago wanted to dump Kyle for nothing......they achieved that when they dumped Kyle for nothing.

Receiving back salary when you are trying to dump salary means that you are bad at your job. This is why you are bad at the internet.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#55 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:01 pm

MaceCase wrote:Hunny......sweetums.....snookums......

Chicago wanted to dump Kyle for nothing......they achieved that when they dumped Kyle for nothing.

Receiving back salary when you are trying to dump salary means that you are bad at your job. This is why you are bad at the internet.


:lol:
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,655
And1: 13,125
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: Horford won 

Post#56 » by jayu70 » Sun Aug 30, 2015 1:44 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
MaceCase wrote:Would appear to me that you are once again taking some speculation of something maybe possibly could happen....and mistaking it for something that was actually even considered. C'est la Jamaal.


1. I'm honestly not sure YOU even know what you're arguing about anymore.

2. I absolutely adore that your newest catchphrase is an homage to me. :nod:

The heart of this entire debate is this:

MaceCase wrote:No Joe trade no TPE, not TPE no Kyle.


And it's 100% INACCURATE.

CHI was looking to dump Korver and get NOTHING in return. And there were a number of ways to accomplish this.

But I do love the thought of Jamaaliver putting more consideration into potential trade scenarios than either Danny ferry or anyone in the Chicago Bulls front office. Cause if they weren't considering very basic ways to complete a necessary salary dump (trade Korver for a 2nd round pick, trade Korver for the draft rights to Cenk Aykol, trade Korver in a sign & trade for Kirk Hinrich) that means they're not very good at their jobs.

But when it comes to thinking outside the box

...that's Jamaal. :D

^I absolutely LOVE this!!!!

And I love you.
:argue:

:box:

:kiss

:cuddle


1. If memory serves me correctly we couldn't trade just a 2nd rounder for Korver since we didn't have cap space to absorb his $5 million dollar contract.

2. A SnT with Hinrich would mean we would have to pay him more than he was worth to make salaries match Korver's $5 million or include a player which is added salary for Bulls. Kirk signed a 2yr/$6 mil deal.

No Joe trade, no trade exception, no Korver.
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,655
And1: 13,125
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: Horford won 

Post#57 » by jayu70 » Sun Aug 30, 2015 1:46 pm

jayu70 wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:
MaceCase wrote:Would appear to me that you are once again taking some speculation of something maybe possibly could happen....and mistaking it for something that was actually even considered. C'est la Jamaal.


1. I'm honestly not sure YOU even know what you're arguing about anymore.

2. I absolutely adore that your newest catchphrase is an homage to me. :nod:

The heart of this entire debate is this:

MaceCase wrote:No Joe trade no TPE, not TPE no Kyle.


And it's 100% INACCURATE.

CHI was looking to dump Korver and get NOTHING in return. And there were a number of ways to accomplish this.

But I do love the thought of Jamaaliver putting more consideration into potential trade scenarios than either Danny ferry or anyone in the Chicago Bulls front office. Cause if they weren't considering very basic ways to complete a necessary salary dump (trade Korver for a 2nd round pick, trade Korver for the draft rights to Cenk Aykol, trade Korver in a sign & trade for Kirk Hinrich) that means they're not very good at their jobs.

But when it comes to thinking outside the box

...that's Jamaal. :D

^I absolutely LOVE this!!!!

And I love you.
:argue:

:box:

:kiss

:cuddle


1. If memory serves me correctly (but I could be wrong) we couldn't trade just a 2nd rounder for Korver since we didn't have cap space to absorb his $5 million dollar contract.

2. A SnT with Hinrich would mean we would have to pay him more than he was worth to make salaries match Korver's $5 million or include a player which is added salary for Bulls. Kirk signed a 2yr/$6 mil deal.

No Joe trade, no trade exception, no Korver.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#58 » by Jamaaliver » Sun Aug 30, 2015 6:51 pm

jayu70 wrote:1. If memory serves me correctly we couldn't trade just a 2nd rounder for Korver since we didn't have cap space to absorb his $5 million dollar contract.

2. A SnT with Hinrich would mean we would have to pay him more than he was worth to make salaries match Korver's $5 million or include a player which is added salary for Bulls. Kirk signed a 2yr/$6 mil deal.

No Joe trade, no trade exception, no Korver.


Hello, Jayu70. I appreciate your contribution to the board.

Cards on the table. This line of thinking isn't my own. I actually did some research and found a few places (tweets/whispers) that Hawks and Bulls actually did consider a Sign & Trade. Bulls fans and beat writers all lamented after the fact that signing Hinrich outright instead of doing the sign & trade limited what moves CHI could make moving forward. The trade exception CHI received in exchange for KK ultimately went unused. A fact Bulls fans are very aware of.

That $6 million contract figure is incorrect, as the final contract numbers were closer to 2 years and just under $8 million.

My larger point which seems to have gotten lost in this: JJ was recently recognized as the single best Hawk player of the last decade. A sentiment I agree with. But his salary made it necessary to move him. We didn't get equal value for him. We got expirings and pick swaps and a trade exception. This is disappointing. Especially when Brooklyn 4 months earlier (in a fit of desperation) traded a lottery pick for Gerald Wallace.

Ferry did well to move JJ's contract. I give him full credit for that. But he made a huge mistake in not trading Josh Smith when his stock was high. Then letting him walk away for nothing a year later. I don't want Horford walking away for nothing next year. That would be even more difficult to recover from.

Links below:

Hoops Rumors wrote:Still, while some of the Bulls' offseason choices are defensible, there's still plenty about the team's summer that doesn't make sense. Notably, Chicago's decision to give Kirk Hinrich nearly $4MM in mid-level exception money ensured that the Bulls would be hard-capped this season, unable to pass $74,307,000 in team salary at any point.

As Mark Deeks of ShamSports and others have noted, the teams could have reworked the two moves into one, sending Hinrich to Chicago in a sign-and-trade transaction. Had they done that, the Bulls would've retained their mid-level exception and avoided the hard cap

HERE




Mike Prada wrote:[The Bulls] got a trade exception back, but given their obvious desire to avoid the luxury tax, I doubt they use it. The sensible thing, if they wanted Hinrich anyway, was to work out a sign-and-trade where they'd swap him for Korver. Not sure why the Bulls didn't do that.
HERE




Mark Deeks wrote:To avoid having to pay him $500,000 in guaranteed compensation, the Bulls traded Kyle Korver to Atlanta in exchange for a nominal amount of cash. This is the same team from which they signed Hinrich. Had the Hawks signed-and-traded Hinrich for Korver, the Bulls wouldn't need to have used the MLE to sign Hinrich. The only negative difference in this outcome would have been the Bulls didn't create a TPE of $5 million, which they did in the real one. Yet it now matters not. The S&T was discussed, but it wasn't done.

HERE (NOTE: Mark Deeks' original piece from Sham Sports is no longer available as the entire blog has been removed from the interwebs. I copied the text from a longstanding Bulls fan site that also linked back to the original site.)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hinrich is believed to have signed a two-year deal worth roughly $8 million.

Here

Rose’s torn ACL will keep him out until late January at the earliest, and his new caddies are Kirk Hinrich, the former Bull who was re-signed for $8 million over two years, and rookie Marquis Teague.

Here



But again, the entire point of the thread is that while I do think Horford comes back on a max salary next summer....there exists the possibility he could be wooed away.

In addition, as much as I love AL. I'm not certain making him a max player gets us closer to a championship. Paying Horford and Millsap a combined salary around 50% of our cap number seems a risky proposition.
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Horford won 

Post#59 » by MaceCase » Sun Aug 30, 2015 8:48 pm

Except a sign and trade would have had to have been for a minimum of 3 years instead of two and still have hard capped the Bulls at the apron for the season....

A team may only acquire a free agent via a sign-and-trade if the team’s Team Salary post-transaction and at all times thereafter during that Salary Cap Year does not exceed the Tax Level plus $4 million

http://www.nba.com/media/CBA101.pdf

So trade Kyle into a TPE and also garner a $5 million TPE and cash plus your full exceptions or move him in a sign and trade to retain only a $3 million exception....both resulting in your team being hard capped.

Yea, I wonder why Bulls management moved on from the option that garnered them less options and flexibility. See how nonsense gets propagated down the line when people speculate but forget to check the "minutia" first?
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,848
And1: 17,411
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Horford won 

Post#60 » by Jamaaliver » Mon Aug 31, 2015 1:12 am

MaceCase wrote:So trade Kyle into a TPE and also garner a $5 million TPE and cash plus your full exceptions or move him in a sign and trade to retain only a $3 million exception....both resulting in your team being hard capped.

Yea, I wonder why Bulls management moved on from the option that garnered them less options and flexibility. See how nonsense gets propagated down the line when people speculate but forget to check the "minutia" first?


So you concede this was indeed an option that they considered and that would have allowed them to end up at the same place?
A. Moving Korver B. Acquiring Hinrich C. The use of the MLE up to $4 million above the cap

Beyond that, I suggest you contact Mark Deeks of Sham Sports who originated the report.

He is considered by most NBA Insiders to be one of the foremost experts on the CBA, the salary cap and contract negotiations in the Association.

Deeks...has managed to cultivate a web of contacts that give him not just salary information, but incentives, trade kickers, cap percentages, and all the cascading minutiae that goes into the NBA contract sausage.
HERE

If you honestly believe you're smarter, more connected than a guy regarded as one of the most knowledgeable humans on Earth in CBA specifics...knock yourself out.

I look forward to the response he gives you. Seriously.

PS It's spelled minutiae. That's the plural form and proper usage.

PPS...you forgot to call out my name at the end of your last post...

MaceCase wrote: C'est la Jamaal :sour:

Return to Atlanta Hawks