VCfor3 wrote:I can't see a way Collins isn't with you guys after the deadline if I'm honest. That said I was trying to find something that may make at least a little sense if your FO really was against paying him a max contract. By a little sense I mean you guys don't hang up, ponder a moment, and then politely decline.
MIN in: Collins
ATL in: 23 MIN 1st (top 4 prot), 24 swap (top 4 prot), PF from 3rd team
For the third team I was looking at two options:
MEM: Anderson for Culver (Rondo to MIN)
ORL: Gordon for Culver, Snell, 2nds from MIN
So basically you guys get either Kyle Anderson or Aaron Gordon who are starting level PFs that aren't TOO old plus a pick and a swap from a dysfunctional franchise. Your playoff push this year would definitely take a hit since both players I suggested would be worse than Collins, but unless GSW puts the MIN pick on the table I don't know if another team would really beat this offer.
Again, I expect Collins to be with you guys for the next few years. His offense is important and you definitely want to see what you have in Hunter paired with Collins before making any drastic decisions. In theory Trae/Hunter/Collins/Capela is a strong enough core moving forward that you just need to figure out what you want to do at SG and then let your guys develop into hopefully a contender.
PS: Feel free to throw this in the trade thread if you prefer.
We would loose Collins who defends good with Capela, Snell who is on fire and defend or Rondo defense needed in payoffs behind Trae (we can be sure of anything of Dunn at this moment) too get Anderson or Gordon and picks ?
I think we would say goodbye to any potential first round win this year and next year
For Collins contract, guys (staff and him) have to find a way to all agree on the fact that the best model these last twenty years is SAS, that Collins is no better than Ginobili or Parker, and that this team didn't give any Max contract except for Duncan.
If everybody understand it and that it's the best chance at building a contender, they can find a agreement for less than the Max for sure (he was asking 25M/year).
If they finish the season reaching their goal, and see that the team is improving, how can you prefer to risk ending up on a team not being improving like that even if you get a bigger contract. It's not like Max elsewhere or 10M/year here, it's not like he get a bad contract if he's getting 25M/year