Page 1 of 1
Interesting trade offer
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:03 pm
by geeman
On one of the board " hawks firesale" this was offered! I kind of like it and I think it would work cap wise, because OKC is under the cap
Re: Hawks firesale, make all offers
by azuresou1 on Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:59 pm
sportscrazy wrote:
Then the Thunder use the rest of their cap space on Shaquille O'Neal if LeBron leaves.
C-Shaq
PF-Krstic
SF-Durant
SG-Johnson
PG-Westbrook
Change that to " James Harden and Serge Ibaka and it's a done deal" .
Re: Interesting trade offer
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:20 pm
by evildallas
Harden and Ibaka would be great for Johnson. Sign me up.
That thread showed me that several of our players are loved around the league:
Joe, Josh, Al (especially), even some Marvin interest, Teague, and Jamal
The other ideas that I liked was the thought of getting Darren Collison or Roddy Beaubouis in some form of deal.
An intriguing idea was Hedo for Marvin. Not saying I'd do it because of the contract, but Hedo's playmaking in the 4th would be welcome.
Re: Interesting trade offer
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:36 pm
by parson
Turkoglu tries to control the ball in the 4th. How in the world would that work here?
Consider how poorly it worked this year with a good PG in TOR.
Re: Interesting trade offer
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:25 pm
by evildallas
parson wrote:Turkoglu tries to control the ball in the 4th. How in the world would that work here?
Consider how poorly it worked this year with a good PG in TOR.
In Orlando he managed to get the ball to the right player at the right time in the 4th. He's not a shot maker, but a playmaker. I was imagining him without Joe on the roster. I'd rather have a PG and a system that uses one. I hope Jeff Teague is that guy because Lawson, Collison, Beaubouis all proved they could do the job as late picks (even AJ Price showed he could play). Teague hasn't been given the chance or the coaching yet to prove anything either way.
Re: Interesting trade offer
Posted: Sat May 1, 2010 2:15 am
by parson
evildallas wrote: I was imagining him without Joe on the roster.
IF our problem is that Joe is a ball hog, then you're right. I don't think that's the case; I think it's Woodson's scheme. If I'm right, then HT would be standing in the far corner where Marvelous now stands, scratching his head.