Tony Parker?
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:19 am
I just read on ESPN that Tony Parker might get dealt this summer as San Antonio strives to remake the roster and he is the most tradeable asset. Got me thinking if they would like to do a S&T for Joe Johnson? I'd do it, but I doubt they would. Changes up their team but doesn't get them younger. Then it got me to think of a larger deal:
Tony Parker
Richard Jefferson (expiring)
A future pick
for
Johnson S&T
Bibby
Marvin Williams
If they'd rather do Childress than Williams in a dual S&T I have no issue with that although it would bloat the payroll for 1 year. I think the size of the deal would overcome any BYC issues involving Childress (at least I hope).
We'd be giving up more talent, but we'd be dumping some longer term commitments and were losing Joe anyway. Furthermore this is about fixing the makeup of this team. Jefferson would be gone after 1 year, but I'd like to resign Parker and I expect contract lengths will get shortened in the new CBA which would fit perfectly with his age. I don't really like giving up on Marvin without seeing him under a different coach (I prefer a Childress deal), but I realize that he will never live up to the expectations of a #2 pick in a Hawks uniform. The pick is negotiable and might not even be in the final trade if it has Childress in it.
I think Tony Parker and his style of play would energize fans and sell tickets. We'd need a new coach and new system, but I think we could maintain our playoff position (especially in the Childress deal) and possibly even improve if the team clicks. As a bonus, Teague would get more time to improve and the system and mentor would better suit his skill set as well.
Tony Parker
Richard Jefferson (expiring)
A future pick
for
Johnson S&T
Bibby
Marvin Williams
If they'd rather do Childress than Williams in a dual S&T I have no issue with that although it would bloat the payroll for 1 year. I think the size of the deal would overcome any BYC issues involving Childress (at least I hope).
We'd be giving up more talent, but we'd be dumping some longer term commitments and were losing Joe anyway. Furthermore this is about fixing the makeup of this team. Jefferson would be gone after 1 year, but I'd like to resign Parker and I expect contract lengths will get shortened in the new CBA which would fit perfectly with his age. I don't really like giving up on Marvin without seeing him under a different coach (I prefer a Childress deal), but I realize that he will never live up to the expectations of a #2 pick in a Hawks uniform. The pick is negotiable and might not even be in the final trade if it has Childress in it.
I think Tony Parker and his style of play would energize fans and sell tickets. We'd need a new coach and new system, but I think we could maintain our playoff position (especially in the Childress deal) and possibly even improve if the team clicks. As a bonus, Teague would get more time to improve and the system and mentor would better suit his skill set as well.