HoopsGuru25 wrote:This also annoys the crap out of me. Could people actually NAME the players they want to start at the 5 when they want to move Al to PF?
On my side, it makes now 3 years that I think of every C we could get, but like Evildallas, I never thought of a starting C.
I always talked about a six-man kind of player, playing 32min at C, which would allow Al to play 16min at C and 16min at PF, with Josh using the 32min left.
It avoid having Josh at SF, and gives a mainly 3 guys rotation, instead of a standard view of starting C and his backup, and starting PF and his backup, and even if the player is coming from the bench, he can have a big salaries because he doesn't have to be viewed as a bench player only but a real rotation player.
Lots of people did not agree with view, saying that you can't have a C backup at 9 or 10M, but nobody said anything about Crawford at 10M coming from the bench.
The C I was hoping at first was Camby, and we hear a rumor about DEN wanting the Acie pick for Camby at draft time. The following season, I remember we talked about WAS and something build on Zaza+Speedy for Haywood+Daniels.
Then last season, I thought it would be interesting to make Marvin+Zaza+Speedy for Miller+Salmons.
All these trades makes the Crawford trade impossible, but since I am pretty sure that we would have been nearly on the same level with Murray instead of Crawford, I would have had no problem with Miller, Salmons and Murray, compared to Zaza, Marvin and Crawford.