If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
If the Hawks can move Joe, and miss out on Dwight, Deron, and CP3, should the Hawks make an offer and over pay Andrew Bynum (offer an extra 2-3 million per year to what ever the Lakers offer him)?
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,137
- And1: 11,323
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
-
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Harry10 wrote:If the Hawks can move Joe, and miss out on Dwight, Deron, and CP3, should the Hawks make an offer and over pay Andrew Bynum (offer an extra 2-3 million per year to what ever the Lakers offer him)?
We don't know what the CBA will look like but either way, it'll take more than an extra 2-3 mil to get Andrew.
Now that I think about it, why would he leave L.A.?
President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Wizardspride wrote:We don't know what the CBA will look like but either way, it'll take more than an extra 2-3 mil to get Andrew.
Now that I think about it, why would he leave L.A.?
to make an extra 18 million. that is an extra 900 thousand for his agent, for a guy who is not making any commericals in LA.
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Geaux_Hawks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,473
- And1: 1,154
- Joined: Feb 18, 2011
-
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Man his knees would really have to hold up without injury before I even think about giving him 10-12 million. He is liable to go down at anytime, which is too risky for me. He could very well go on to stay healthy for the rest of his career, but I would rather let LA pay him to do so.
Why not go after Hibbert, who has a QO that year??
Why not go after Hibbert, who has a QO that year??
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Extra 18 million? In what planet would a team like the Hawks outbid the Lakers for a player they clearly want to keep?
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
HoopsGuru25 wrote:Extra 18 million? In what planet would a team like the Hawks outbid the Lakers for a player they clearly want to keep?
the same team who gave Joe two huge contracts
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
I did not know that the Lakers have a Payroll of $90 million o.O
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- Senior
- Posts: 685
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
if ignoring injury risk which you would need to to want bynum, would prefer to overpay oden that same amount of money which would tempt portland to a sign and trade
but would prefer to avoid both like the plague
but would prefer to avoid both like the plague
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
johnny878 wrote:if ignoring injury risk which you would need to to want bynum, would prefer to overpay oden that same amount of money which would tempt portland to a sign and trade
but would prefer to avoid both like the plague
on average, Oden misses 61 games a year due to injury, Bynum on average misses 27 games a year. i feel better over paying Bynum for 55 games, then overpaying Joe for 82 games.
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Geaux_Hawks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,473
- And1: 1,154
- Joined: Feb 18, 2011
-
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Harry10 wrote:johnny878 wrote:if ignoring injury risk which you would need to to want bynum, would prefer to overpay oden that same amount of money which would tempt portland to a sign and trade
but would prefer to avoid both like the plague
on average, Oden misses 61 games a year due to injury, Bynum on average misses 27 games a year. i feel better over paying Bynum for 55 games, then overpaying Joe for 82 games.
The same reason I disagreed on overpaying for Bynum is because, we may have him for the regular season, but come play off time, he is to hurt to make the impact he did during the regular season. I think I would take Oden at a cheaper price and get similar production if not the same.
Still wouldn't mind taking Oden this off season. Just saying
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Bucked19
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 819
- And1: 8
- Joined: Feb 23, 2011
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Ya'll act like Joe is so bad,if he gets a major injury ya'll will see how bad the team is without him
Hard in the paint like Josh Smith, do not slip, I bang mine I'm zone one bankhead shawty, I'm west side no gang signs
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Bucked19 wrote:Ya'll act like Joe is so bad,if he gets a major injury ya'll will see how bad the team is without him
He's overpaid.
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Bucked19
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 819
- And1: 8
- Joined: Feb 23, 2011
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Ruhiel wrote:Bucked19 wrote:Ya'll act like Joe is so bad,if he gets a major injury ya'll will see how bad the team is without him
He's overpaid.
So,its not his fault
Hard in the paint like Josh Smith, do not slip, I bang mine I'm zone one bankhead shawty, I'm west side no gang signs
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- Geaux_Hawks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,473
- And1: 1,154
- Joined: Feb 18, 2011
-
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Bucked19 wrote:Ruhiel wrote:Bucked19 wrote:Ya'll act like Joe is so bad,if he gets a major injury ya'll will see how bad the team is without him
He's overpaid.
So,its not his fault
I agree he is overpaid and its not his fault because of it, but we do realize we wouldn't be the 3rd-5th seed team we are now without him unless we had adequate pieces.
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
It's not his fault he's overpaid...but that doesn't mean the criticism he gets isn't warranted. He appears apathetic in any situation outside of criticizing the fans(and occasionally other players),doesn't have an impact on ticket sales,and is slowly getting a rep for being on of the worst "big game" players in the league(excluding game 4 vs Boston and game 7 vs Miami).
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact:
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
Should the Hawks move Joe? Yes, even as a good player he was never going to be worth what they paid him.
Should the Hawks go after Bynum? Maybe. I mean sure I'd check to see if he was available and for how much, but it isn't like he's a free agent. He can be a difference making big, but he has a history of health issues. Those haunt a lot of bigs. The truth is that it would likely be a waste to go after Bynum because of the combined cost of assets to acquire him and salary to pay him factored against his likelihood of injury and the remaining amount of talent on the roster. We'd not have enough left to truly compete after being bent over by the Lakers in any trade scenario. We'd have the key big, but then we'd have to build back up around him all the time hoping that he's still healthy when we get the pieces in place.
Should the Hawks go after Bynum? Maybe. I mean sure I'd check to see if he was available and for how much, but it isn't like he's a free agent. He can be a difference making big, but he has a history of health issues. Those haunt a lot of bigs. The truth is that it would likely be a waste to go after Bynum because of the combined cost of assets to acquire him and salary to pay him factored against his likelihood of injury and the remaining amount of talent on the roster. We'd not have enough left to truly compete after being bent over by the Lakers in any trade scenario. We'd have the key big, but then we'd have to build back up around him all the time hoping that he's still healthy when we get the pieces in place.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Re: If the Hawks can move Joe, Should the team go after Bynum
evildallas wrote:Should the Hawks move Joe? Yes, even as a good player he was never going to be worth what they paid him.
Should the Hawks go after Bynum? Maybe. I mean sure I'd check to see if he was available and for how much, but it isn't like he's a free agent. He can be a difference making big, but he has a history of health issues. Those haunt a lot of bigs. The truth is that it would likely be a waste to go after Bynum because of the combined cost of assets to acquire him and salary to pay him factored against his likelihood of injury and the remaining amount of talent on the roster. We'd not have enough left to truly compete after being bent over by the Lakers in any trade scenario. We'd have the key big, but then we'd have to build back up around him all the time hoping that he's still healthy when we get the pieces in place.
it is not a trade scenario..... its a 2013 free agent signing scenario, because i do think at Bynum and his agent are going to test the free agent market