Bulls blowouts not a good representation, cuz Al was hurt?
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:23 am
people say that Horford was injured at the end of the season, which was the excuse of the poor production of Horford in the last month of the season.
the one win that the Hawks had against the Bulls was when Horford was the most important player in the game, dominating both Noah and Boozer, and putting up Dwight like numbers, 31/16.
should fans put alot into the two Bulls blowouts?
was Horford playing injured in those last two Chicago games?
is Horford healthy now, going into the Chicago series?
will Horford and Smoove be able to dominate all of the Bulls post players in the whole series, like they did in the first meeting?
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1102043
the one win that the Hawks had against the Bulls was when Horford was the most important player in the game, dominating both Noah and Boozer, and putting up Dwight like numbers, 31/16.
should fans put alot into the two Bulls blowouts?
was Horford playing injured in those last two Chicago games?
is Horford healthy now, going into the Chicago series?
will Horford and Smoove be able to dominate all of the Bulls post players in the whole series, like they did in the first meeting?
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1102043