ImageImage

What do we want for Smoove

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

User avatar
ATL Boy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,959
And1: 4,005
Joined: May 15, 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
       

What do we want for Smoove 

Post#1 » by ATL Boy » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:01 pm

We heard all these proposals from other fans and all. But I am curious, what would us Hawks fans want for Josh?
SichtingLives wrote:life hack:

When a man heaves a live chainsaw towards you from distance, stand still. No one has good accuracy throwing a chainsaw.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#2 » by azuresou1 » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:06 pm

A young quality C. Brook Lopez, Roy Hibbert, guys like that.
myrak433
Starter
Posts: 2,007
And1: 231
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#3 » by myrak433 » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:19 pm

we would want a sure starting center that would be a clear upgrade over Horford at the center position. like Bogut, Dwight, maybe Gasol.


or someone that is 7 feet tall who as some potential to be our starting center but may have some concerns such as injuries like Beans, Kaman, or Okur; played good for a season or two but may have regressed like Robin Lopez; or may not be a true center but is 7 feet tall and has a true skill set that they are really good at like Bargs in scoring.

with the underlined we would need a first round pick as well. the pick would be to replace Smiths athleticism someone like Derrick Williams, Tristan Thompson, Marcus or Markieff Morris, and Bismack to name a few
December of 2019 “Trae Young Involved in 'Emotional' Locker Room Scene After Hawks Loss. Atlanta Hawks star Trae Young is unsurprisingly getting tired of the team's struggles.”

Get Trae some HELP!!!!
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#4 » by evildallas » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:32 pm

Want to either fix the lineup or fix the payroll.

Josh Smith doesn't have to be traded, so no low ball offers need apply. The rumor mill is churning because of several things like analysis that our ownership is weak, analysis that Joe Johnson is very expensive, realization that Josh and Al truly play the same position although each can play a 2nd position, given his post season performance and length of contract Josh would likely return the most in trade, and Josh being sensitive to public criticism of his shooting.

The big problems with the team contract wise are Joe Johnson, who is got horribly overpaid in terms of dollars and contract length because the team imagined they had no choice, and Marvin Williams, who has failed to earn what should have been a reasonable contract at the time. If you replace Marvin Williams with a rookie scale player that puts up similar stats then there is no pressure to cut salary. If you replace Joe Johnson with someone making half as much money for an approximation of the stats then you have no pressure either.

As far as fixing the lineup, if you figure Al goes to the 4, we need a C and we could use either wing spot (Joe can move to SF) to upgrade Marvin. We also might be looking for a bench scorer to replace Jamal Crawford as well.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#5 » by parson » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:49 pm

evildallas wrote:Want to either fix the lineup or fix the payroll.

This.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Superiorblogman
Banned User
Posts: 2,173
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2011
Location: The Transplant Capital

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#6 » by Superiorblogman » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:52 pm

We don't need a either or thing with trading such an important piece. We need a little of everything to trade Josh. I would love to get Bogut or Lopez but I don't see getting a rare quality Center for Josh. Even with Boguts health concerns I would do that trade today, right now. I think at the end of the day. Monta and Biedrins for Josh, Marvin, and Zaza is more feasible and could help us more than any other trade that can be dreamed up.
guaves13
Veteran
Posts: 2,644
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#7 » by guaves13 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:24 am

How about this from PHX:

Rolo (1yr $2.87m)
Pietrus (1yr $5.3m)
#13 pick in 2011 draft

As a draft day deal it should work in the checker. About $10m in and $12.5 out for ATL.
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,996
And1: 10,356
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#8 » by HMFFL » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:34 am

guaves13 wrote:How about this from PHX:

Rolo (1yr $2.87m)
Pietrus (1yr $5.3m)
#13 pick in 2011 draft

As a draft day deal it should work in the checker. About $10m in and $12.5 out for ATL.


Makes no sense for us. Robin Lopez has yet to prove he can be a productive player in the league, Mickael Pietrus has no value since he exercised his player option, and there's a very little chance that whomever we draft with the 13th pick produces what Josh already does for us.
guaves13
Veteran
Posts: 2,644
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#9 » by guaves13 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:53 am

HMFFL wrote:
guaves13 wrote:How about this from PHX:

Rolo (1yr $2.87m)
Pietrus (1yr $5.3m)
#13 pick in 2011 draft

As a draft day deal it should work in the checker. About $10m in and $12.5 out for ATL.


Makes no sense for us. Robin Lopez has yet to prove he can be a productive player in the league, Mickael Pietrus has no value since he exercised his player option, and there's a very little chance that whomever we draft with the 13th pick produces what Josh already does for us.


I beg to differ on Lopez. With Amare in PHX Lopez was actually pretty effective. His back injury set him back quite a bit and he seemed less confident last year without benefiting from all the attention that Amare used to draw. Horford could take some of the pressure off of him and another offseason of rehab should strengthen his back and legs. Not saying he is a sure thing but at less than $3m for 1 season he isn't much of a risk.

As far as Pietrus goes, not sure how he would be of any value in a trade had he opted out. Worst case ATL gets a solid young player and $8m in trade bait or $10m in salary cap relief. Best case ATL hits the jackpot with a player like Biyombo, Thompson, or Hamilton who become a borderline all star like Smith (#18 pick by the way). Lopez bounces back to 09/10 form and could start for you. Pietrus gives you energy off the bench and could net you some more help at the deadline in the form of an expiring.
HoopsGuru25
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 18, 2006

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#10 » by HoopsGuru25 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:22 am

As frustrating as Smith is...his production is much better than his trade value around the league. The only way you trade him is for someone like Brook Lopez or Bogut and trades like that just don't happen in the NBA("big for small").
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,996
And1: 10,356
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#11 » by HMFFL » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:47 am

guaves13 wrote:I beg to differ on Lopez. With Amare in PHX Lopez was actually pretty effective. His back injury set him back quite a bit and he seemed less confident last year without benefiting from all the attention that Amare used to draw. Horford could take some of the pressure off of him and another offseason of rehab should strengthen his back and legs. Not saying he is a sure thing but at less than $3m for 1 season he isn't much of a risk.

As far as Pietrus goes, not sure how he would be of any value in a trade had he opted out. Worst case ATL gets a solid young player and $8m in trade bait or $10m in salary cap relief. Best case ATL hits the jackpot with a player like Biyombo, Thompson, or Hamilton who become a borderline all star like Smith (#18 pick by the way). Lopez bounces back to 09/10 form and could start for you. Pietrus gives you energy off the bench and could net you some more help at the deadline in the form of an expiring.


Sounds like a great deal of time to invest in Lopez to wait for him to prove himself. His QF is due after next season and that's just too much of a risk for us. I'm just not very impressed with him or anyone that must rely on a teammate to produce.

The high expiring contracts ($5 or more million) tend to be overrated. The reason why he exercised his option is because the $5.3 million he's going to make next season would most likely double his value if he had become a free agent. We already have Kirk Hinrich's expiring contract to possibly move and he actually has value that can acquire us a decent return.

Your offer is low risk, high reward for Phoenix, and for us it's high risk, low reward. Most likely complete bust!
guaves13
Veteran
Posts: 2,644
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#12 » by guaves13 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:02 am

So the $10m of salary relief in 12/13 wouldn't interest the team? I respect your opinion but considering Smith was picked nearly in the 20's it seems a bit shortsighted to rule out a pick in the late lotto.

Hopefully if the team really is entertaining offers they get some better ones. In my opinion it's a pretty good offer.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,745
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#13 » by dms269 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:18 am

guaves13 wrote:So the $10m of salary relief in 12/13 wouldn't interest the team? I respect your opinion but considering Smith was picked nearly in the 20's it seems a bit shortsighted to rule out a pick in the late lotto.

Hopefully if the team really is entertaining offers they get some better ones. In my opinion it's a pretty good offer.


I doubt the Hawks want to straight salary dump Josh Smith. Marvin? Maybe. JJ? maybe, but Josh Smith? Seriously doubt it.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,996
And1: 10,356
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#14 » by HMFFL » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:19 am

guaves13 wrote:So the $10m of salary relief in 12/13 wouldn't interest the team? I respect your opinion but considering Smith was picked nearly in the 20's it seems a bit shortsighted to rule out a pick in the late lotto.

Hopefully if the team really is entertaining offers they get some better ones. In my opinion it's a pretty good offer.


If you want to relieve us of salary you can take Marvin Williams off our hands. Does that interest you? Probably not, which is the same way I feel about Josh Smith, since you're proposal offers us no value, and lowers our chances of improving to a higher seed during next years postseason.

Most of the players from the 04 first round draft are still playing in the NBA, so I view that as a strong draft, but this years draft is considered very weak.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,745
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#15 » by dms269 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:33 am

It seems that most offers for Smith are a straight salary dump.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
guaves13
Veteran
Posts: 2,644
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#16 » by guaves13 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:43 am

I guess I just don't see it as a "straight salary dump" when we are giving up our lotto. I bet if it were the Hawk's pick you would see it as alot more valueable. It's ok though, agree to disagree.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#17 » by Geaux_Hawks » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:02 am

Any trade of josh will have to give us a roster fix. Anything involving just salary relief won't help since Joe has such a healthy salary. So we have to make a "win now" move..
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#18 » by Ruhiel » Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:32 am

Can someone make a thread on what you CAN get for a 6'8 sf/pf.

next to some bigs I'm telling you guys we are close.

Al at 6'10 and a set shooter skills he has a hook shot and contestable fade away in the post. He can defend most power forwards but he is easily smothered in the playoffs.

If Horford were a legit 6'11" and could shoot 3s over people, he'd probably be a hall of Famer, maybe a slow rebounder like Rasheed but more active on offense Rasheed Wallace.
But he's not that big and he's not a hall of Famer or and in 14 years Rasheed a man who was frequently called unaggressive never sunk to the low USG% Al has had.

It's not Al's


Were Horford as athletic or long as Griffin/Amare , he might be able to compensate for his lack of size with leaping ability. But he isn't that athletic, so he has to use positioning and guts to get the job done. Positioning and guts work a lot better against Milwaukee than they do against the Bulls, Knicks, Philadelphia, Miami or Chicago, unfortunately.

Horford has developed a league leading % set shot, shooting the ball mostly on pick and pops ala Boris Diaw on Phoenix or Dirk in Dallas. Horford is not as effective a creator as Dirk by any stretch right now.
His low usage and complimentary more akin to tantalizing Diaw types.
Because of his size, Horford is prone to defenders smothering his shooting pocket something that has plagued him over 39 playoff games. (10ppg)

The truth about Horford hurts because he's the type of kid you want to succeed -- like Shane Battier from Duke or Chuck Hayes of Houston. But unlike those guys, Horford is a center trapped in a smaller man's body and only through massive effort can the much-beloved Hawk overcome his natural deficiencies.
- altered from a certain Draftexpress player
johnny878
Senior
Posts: 685
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 27, 2008

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#19 » by johnny878 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:42 am

best player available.

hawks are going to lose out on this trade no matter what more then likely. As smith's impact seems to be much larger then his trade value.

By going soley for need, the hawks will likely further shortchange themselves on the value they are getting back.
User avatar
ATL Boy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,959
And1: 4,005
Joined: May 15, 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
       

Re: What do we want for Smoove 

Post#20 » by ATL Boy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:46 am

I would want to do Josh, Kirk, and future 1st rounder for Bogut, and bad contract. The Bucks get salary relief with Kirks expiring and they let go of a bad contract, and they get Josh, we get our need at center filled. What do you guys think.
SichtingLives wrote:life hack:

When a man heaves a live chainsaw towards you from distance, stand still. No one has good accuracy throwing a chainsaw.

Return to Atlanta Hawks