Page 1 of 1

Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Mon Jan 2, 2012 10:26 am
by baseline33
probably not, but why not make a phone call :dontknow:

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Mon Jan 2, 2012 12:19 pm
by joe56755
the contracts dont match according to trade checker . the hawks would have to add some1 , probably phoenix would want teague but id think that would be a bad trade for atlanta .

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Mon Jan 2, 2012 7:18 pm
by ATL Boy
joe56755 wrote:the contracts dont match according to trade checker . the hawks would have to add some1 , probably phoenix would want teague but id think that would be a bad trade for atlanta .

Agreed 0% we give them a young great PG with amazing potential like Teague for less than a year of Nash. I'm so happy that we didn't trade them teague and a pick for nash at last years trade deadline.

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Mon Jan 2, 2012 8:07 pm
by scoobs07
When does Hinrich come back from injury? How about Hinrich for Mo Williams. They make about the same amount of money. Mo is signed for one more year than Kirk, but Mo is also 2 years younger and more talented. I wouldnt mind it for the Clippers becasue Hinrich has better size for the shooting guard position (Clippers currently have Billups and Mo at the position), plus Del Negro is familiar with him.

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Mon Jan 2, 2012 10:06 pm
by HMFFL
scoobs07 wrote:When does Hinrich come back from injury? How about Hinrich for Mo Williams. They make about the same amount of money. Mo is signed for one more year than Kirk, but Mo is also 2 years younger and more talented. I wouldnt mind it for the Clippers becasue Hinrich has better size for the shooting guard position (Clippers currently have Billups and Mo at the position), plus Del Negro is familiar with him.


We should have a better indication of when he'll return January 3rd. That's when he goes back to the doc to have his shoulder examined.

I'll pass on Mo Williams. He has a player option for next season at $8.5 million and he has always been a low FG shooter.

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Mon Jan 2, 2012 11:59 pm
by dms269
Yes no to Mo Williams. Bad fg%. Doesn't have the size to play the 2 like Crawford did. Just a bad deal all around.

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Tue Jan 3, 2012 6:19 pm
by evildallas
I"m no on both ideas. Nash is an offensive force, but he's defensively weak, he's old, and he'd be one and gone in free agency. As for Mo Williams, I wasn't a fan when he was in Cleveland. I was in favor on dealing Kirk before the season started, but I'm able to live with Pargo and Green giving Teague breaks and Teague getting certain big minutes.

Re: Kirk for Nash?

Posted: Tue Jan 3, 2012 11:45 pm
by SUN
That's not gonna happen buddy.