ImageImage

We're too small.

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

We're too small. 

Post#1 » by parson » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:13 am

I know Ferry is waiting for the offseason to commit his money, but this team is giving up. When Horford is playing with a beat-up hip, when Smith looks beat, THAT'S ALL WE HAVE.

We have to stop playing the small lineup. Zaza can't anchor the middle alone, so we have to get another big man to either tag team with him or to handle the middle by himself.

Some how, some way, we have to get another Center, move Horford to PF and Smith to SF and stop beating them up.

Once the players quit, it's over.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Yungsta404
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,407
And1: 472
Joined: Jan 23, 2012
Location: ATL

Re: We're too small. 

Post#2 » by Yungsta404 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:01 am

we have been undersized for YEARS and never had a true center since mutombo. The management has had some truely pathetic attempts to fix our size issue by getting guys like ethan thomas, eric dampier, and jason collins.
User avatar
Hawk4Playoffs
Sophomore
Posts: 236
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 16, 2006

Re: We're too small. 

Post#3 » by Hawk4Playoffs » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:27 am

Don't forget draft picks like soloman jones, sheldon williams, keith benson...
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,166
And1: 17,179
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: We're too small. 

Post#4 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:29 am

I agree that size is needed. Last night we were undersized at every single position in the starting lineup when compared to CHI. Don't know if it would have helped, but starting Zaza last night might have been a good start.

I've believed for sometime that getting a real center and moving AL to PF would give us an advantage in the paint, on the boards, in a zone defense, etc.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: We're too small. 

Post#5 » by Rip2137 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:30 pm

Last night no one could hit a shot AT ALL. EVERYONE shoot horribly and no bench player could hit a single shot in the first half. You can have all 7'12" players on the court, if they can't score, they can't score
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: We're too small. 

Post#6 » by MaceCase » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:05 pm

We're too soft.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're too small. 

Post#7 » by parson » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:50 pm

Rip2137 wrote:Last night no one could hit a shot AT ALL. EVERYONE shoot horribly and no bench player could hit a single shot in the first half. You can have all 7'12" players on the court, if they can't score, they can't score

When you're up against a bigger man, it's easier for him to push you around and affect your shot. Take the time to look up average shooting percentages OUTSIDE the paint. I've seen the numbers at between 30-35%. Essentially, teams shoot about the same from 3 as they do from inside the arc.

If you can push a team out of the paint, make them shoot from the perimeter and keep them from getting offensive rebounds (which result in short shots), then you can be a dominant defense. How else do you think Larry Bird's Celtics were so good defensively when only McHale and Dennis Johnson were good defenders?
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: We're too small. 

Post#8 » by Geaux_Hawks » Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:08 pm

Its funny how we complain about needing size, but would have never took a chance on Robin Lopez, Koufos, Pekovich, Vucevic, Hawes before now. Anyway, I think Mozgov would be fine for us.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: We're too small. 

Post#9 » by Rip2137 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:13 pm

parson wrote:
Rip2137 wrote:Last night no one could hit a shot AT ALL. EVERYONE shoot horribly and no bench player could hit a single shot in the first half. You can have all 7'12" players on the court, if they can't score, they can't score

When you're up against a bigger man, it's easier for him to push you around and affect your shot. Take the time to look up average shooting percentages OUTSIDE the paint. I've seen the numbers at between 30-35%. Essentially, teams shoot about the same from 3 as they do from inside the arc.

If you can push a team out of the paint, make them shoot from the perimeter and keep them from getting offensive rebounds (which result in short shots), then you can be a dominant defense. How else do you think Larry Bird's Celtics were so good defensively when only McHale and Dennis Johnson were good defenders?


Because they weren't the only good defenders. Guys like Cedric maxwell, Robert Parish and Chris Ford were good defenders as well. (well Parish would foul the hell out of you, but thats a FORM of defense.) Even Larry Bird was amazing off the ball defensively with his sneaky shot blocking and steals.
Skyhawk1
Starter
Posts: 2,106
And1: 102
Joined: Oct 06, 2005
Location: Atlanta

Re: We're too small. 

Post#10 » by Skyhawk1 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:50 pm

MaceCase wrote:We're too soft.
I agree 100%.
GO HAWKS.
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're too small. 

Post#11 » by parson » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:03 pm

Hawk4Playoffs wrote:Don't forget draft picks like soloman jones, sheldon williams, keith benson...

Shelden was a huge mistake but I don't see how we can complain about Solomon and Benson. I'm fine with taking shots on big men in the 2nd round (I'd love to take more shots on big men in the FIRST, as well). Take a gander at Jones' combine numbers: 6' 9.75", 224lbs., 7' 4" wingpan, 9' 1" vertical reach, 7.4% body fat, 39" vertical leap and a max vertical reach of 12' 4".

Ferry can take all the gambles he wants on numbers like that.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")

Return to Atlanta Hawks