RealGM

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/22 ... And-Trades


honestly. I would rather have Teague than Ellis and especially Jennings. What is going on with this team? I'm confused.

I like Monta Ellis at point. just like westbrook!!

Whatever scenario ensure Monta Ellis is not in a Hawks uniform, I'm good with.

Teague > Monta > Jennings, from a purely basketball standpoint.
Teague >> Monta >>>>>>>>>>> Jennings, from an all-things-considered standpoint.

I would be really disappointed if we traded Jeff Teague!

azuresou1 wrote:Teague > Monta > Jennings, from a purely basketball standpoint.
Teague >> Monta >>>>>>>>>>> Jennings, from an all-things-considered standpoint.

From looking at our roster rationally, I honestly could not care less about next season - we're going to be bad. With the possible exception of Teague, I want the most flexibility to get someone off our roster as easily as possible after a year or 2. Of course that will depend on contract length, but all things being equal Jennings>Monta in that regard. Trying to trade a 30 yo combo G whose strength is (was?) speed won't be easy.

To guide a team and make others better at the offensive end: Teague by a mile. If you have a play and want to the PG to keep them ball and do it themselves the Bucks pair are likely superior. To me it like a QB that can run, it's nice to have that skill, but you win games with your arm. A PG is best when he can facilitate others.