King Ken wrote:PandaKidd wrote:I cant believe someone said we should pursue Joe Johnson..........
Why? theres 1000 better options out there. Batum/Barnes/Parsons Hell i would take Deng over JJ. I would take back Marvin Williams over JJ.
Those players aren't readily available. Barnes is resigning as well as Batum, Marvin and Parsons. You can't sign players who don't want to leave and will get paid by their teams.
not if GSW go after Durant. Not if GSW feel like they dont want to lock up a max deal in a guy who is like their 4th option (with curry coming up in a year. I feel like their core is going to be
Klay
Curry
Ezehli
Bogut
Iggy
theyll be able to retain Livingston and Barbosa IMO. They offered Barnes a 4/64 deal and he turned it down. I have a strong feeling Barnes is playing for someone else next year. Hopefully us.
Parsons is prob off limits, Batum im not so sure he wouldnt leave to get a bigger role on another team. A VERY friendly SF team.
Joe is a 3rd tier players who fits what we do. Gives us a solid scorer who plays good defense, shoots threes exceptionally well, plays solid D, is clutch and at a reasonable cost.
Joe Johnson is the exact OPPOSITE player the Hawks want. Hes and Isolation player, a ball stopper. he also wont be cheap. Maybe Cheap-ER. But hardly is JJ the SF of us for the future. WE NEED TO GET YOUNGER. JJ would be abysmal.
Not everyone lacks intelligence and sense like certain posters around here who like to name call and cry foul like little bitches.
