Eastern Conference
1. Cavaliers: 52.1
2. Celtics: 49.8
3. Raptors: 48.8
4. Pistons: 47.5
5. Wizards: 41.4
6. Hornets: 41.0
7. Bucks: 40.9
8. Pacers: 38.9
9. Hawks: 38.6
10. Heat: 38.3
11. Bulls: 37.8
12. Magic: 36.2
13. Knicks: 34.7
14. Nets: 28.8
15. 76ers: 24.5
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/243189/Warriors-Spurs-Cavs-Celtics-Raptors-Lead-ESPNs-RPM-Projected-Wins
ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 53,963
- And1: 10,349
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
- ATL Boy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,959
- And1: 4,005
- Joined: May 15, 2011
- Location: Atlanta GA
-
Re: ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
Things like this are why I don't take ESPN seriously.
SichtingLives wrote:life hack:
When a man heaves a live chainsaw towards you from distance, stand still. No one has good accuracy throwing a chainsaw.
Re: ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 45,159
- And1: 17,179
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
-
Re: ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
It's literally been a decade since we finished that low in the standings. And this isn't the first time ESPN and other pundits have predicted us to finish this low.
I think in terms of roster talent alone, you might make an argument we're middle of the pack. But when you factor in experience, system, coaching, roster fit...we're clearly a better team than 9th in the East.
Geesh....
I figure we should be at least 5-7 range with 42+ wins. (Barring a major injury or trade.)
I think in terms of roster talent alone, you might make an argument we're middle of the pack. But when you factor in experience, system, coaching, roster fit...we're clearly a better team than 9th in the East.
Geesh....
I figure we should be at least 5-7 range with 42+ wins. (Barring a major injury or trade.)
Re: ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,083
- And1: 199
- Joined: Feb 02, 2014
Re: ESPN's RPM Projected Wins
Jamaaliver wrote:It's literally been a decade since we finished that low in the standings. And this isn't the first time ESPN and other pundits have predicted us to finish this low.
I think in terms of roster talent alone, you might make an argument we're middle of the pack. But when you factor in experience, system, coaching, roster fit...we're clearly a better team than 9th in the East.
Geesh....
I figure we should be at least 5-7 range with 42+ wins. (Barring a major injury or trade.)
Yeah 5-7 is reasonable. I can see CLE, BOS, TOR, NY/DET as the only teams that are better.