_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:kg01 wrote:I'm well aware of what Price has been doing the past couple years. In what can only be described as a modern-day Shakespearean twist, this time it is you who haveth failed to comprehendeth what I hath written.
I said he hasn't "shown an ability to be more than a shooting coach". That doesn't mean he hasn't held a position higher than a shooting coach. Just wait ... let it sink in, you'll get it.
Um... hehe... pardon me, my friend but your exact words were...
Price is a shooting coach.
So yeah, I failed to catch the pass, but it was thrown out-of-bounds, so what did anyone expect???...kg01 wrote:I say we just get another solid backup to compete with Trae. Keep Vince around to mentor him.
CLP, in his exit interview, mentioned he doesn't want one voice to spend too much time with any of the players because the message gets stale. I read that to mean we'll never have what you're suggesting, a "personal pg coach" for Trae.
Be honest, @sturt. All these words really warm your cockles, right?
Me, not a fan of spending roster slots on mentoring roles. That's why you have a coaching staff.
And lest I be misunderstood... though I realize the way I said what I did could be reasonably taken to mean "personal coach".... I'm not advocating for a personal coach, per se. I just want someone on the staff who is there and capable to give some specific, experienced advice.
And whether it's Price or Nash or anyone else, I think there are more than enough former PGs in the NBA and college coaching universe that could fit that role well. Nick Van Exel comes to mind, and if I gave it more thought, I'm sure I could generate a half-dozen well-regarded guys, at minimum.
Oh man. I've dived into the patented sturt vortex of symantical arguing. Geronimoooooo!!!!
I don't think Price should be anything more than a shooting coach despite the fact that he's held higher positions. Thus, to me, Price is a shooting coach.
Adding a coach with point guard experience is effectively hiring a personal coach for Trae. Either way you define or explain it, I'm saying it's not necessary. And on the player/mentor thing, pretty much everyone who's asked has said Carter has been a positive influence so I feel like it is indeed worth the bother (roster spot and salary) spent on it.
I'm not saying we need a Haslem sitting on the bench as a mascot. At least Carter can still contribute (some).
And, lastly, I'm not sure anyone knows exactly what 'cockles' are but I'm sure yours get warmer as word counts increase.