Hazer wrote:Here you'll find some spin moves, hooks, floaters, and 3-pointers. I also see shades of The Dream, but only if Bruno SHATTERS his ceiling:
I always have said that hazer is one incredibly intelligent, insightful poster.
Moderators: dms269, Jamaaliver, HMFFL
Hazer wrote:Here you'll find some spin moves, hooks, floaters, and 3-pointers. I also see shades of The Dream, but only if Bruno SHATTERS his ceiling:
Hawk88 wrote:What would be the cost of obtaining Cleveland's No. 5 pick. The players 4-8 are all ranked pretty equally by most assessors. So if they Hawks decided they wanted to swap what do you think the cost would be. 8+10 for 5 seems to high. I don't see Schlenk doing that deal. Would it be 8 and a second rounder? Would it be 8 and the pick they owe us in trade and a second rounder?
I really don't like the idea of moving up to 5 at all.
Hawk88
Hawk88 wrote:What would be the cost of obtaining Cleveland's No. 5 pick. The players 4-8 are all ranked pretty equally by most assessors. So if they Hawks decided they wanted to swap what do you think the cost would be. 8+10 for 5 seems to high. I don't see Schlenk doing that deal. Would it be 8 and a second rounder? Would it be 8 and the pick they owe us in trade and a second rounder?
I really don't like the idea of moving up to 5 at all.
Hawk88
personanongrata wrote:Hawk88 wrote:What would be the cost of obtaining Cleveland's No. 5 pick. The players 4-8 are all ranked pretty equally by most assessors. So if they Hawks decided they wanted to swap what do you think the cost would be. 8+10 for 5 seems to high. I don't see Schlenk doing that deal. Would it be 8 and a second rounder? Would it be 8 and the pick they owe us in trade and a second rounder?
I really don't like the idea of moving up to 5 at all.
Hawk88
Someone on the Cavs message board suggested the price to move to 5 should be 8, 10, 17 and next year's pick back. I'm not kidding.
Deester11 wrote:personanongrata wrote:Hawk88 wrote:What would be the cost of obtaining Cleveland's No. 5 pick. The players 4-8 are all ranked pretty equally by most assessors. So if they Hawks decided they wanted to swap what do you think the cost would be. 8+10 for 5 seems to high. I don't see Schlenk doing that deal. Would it be 8 and a second rounder? Would it be 8 and the pick they owe us in trade and a second rounder?
I really don't like the idea of moving up to 5 at all.
Hawk88
Someone on the Cavs message board suggested the price to move to 5 should be 8, 10, 17 and next year's pick back. I'm not kidding.
Wow. I'd rather draft at every pick than do anything remotely close to that.
jayu70 wrote:Deester11 wrote:personanongrata wrote:
Someone on the Cavs message board suggested the price to move to 5 should be 8, 10, 17 and next year's pick back. I'm not kidding.
Wow. I'd rather draft at every pick than do anything remotely close to that.
Crazy talk.
I wouldn't do 8 and 10 for 5.
Spud2nique wrote:jayu70 wrote:Deester11 wrote:Wow. I'd rather draft at every pick than do anything remotely close to that.
Crazy talk.
I wouldn't do 8 and 10 for 5.
For 3 yes..5 no
jayu70 wrote:Deester11 wrote:personanongrata wrote:
Someone on the Cavs message board suggested the price to move to 5 should be 8, 10, 17 and next year's pick back. I'm not kidding.
Wow. I'd rather draft at every pick than do anything remotely close to that.
Crazy talk.
I wouldn't do 8 and 10 for 5.
Radioblacktive1 wrote:Are we mad at Herro at #17?
Radioblacktive1 wrote:Are we mad at Herro at #17?
_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:Schlenk doesn't draft players on the basis of one skill. That's both what he's told us, and that's what he's done. Probably because he knows he can always pick up that player off the FA market.
Radioblacktive1 wrote:Herro fits the description
_s_t_u_r_t_ wrote:I see what you mean.
We only have Baze. Bembry. Huerter. Crabbe. Anderson.
Can't assume Vince is coming back to be our sixth SG... we need insurance at that position.